IBM SPSS Modeler vs IBM Watson Studio comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
3,065 views|2,425 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
3,203 views|2,111 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM SPSS Modeler and IBM Watson Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Science Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM SPSS Modeler vs. IBM Watson Studio Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Stability is good.""In the solution, I like the virtualization of data flow since it shows what goes where, which is mostly the strength of the tool.""A lot of jobs that are stuck in Excel due to the huge numbers of rows are tackled pretty quickly.""We have full control of the data handling process.""It is a great product for running statistical analysis.""​It works fine. I have not had any stability issues; it is always up.​""Our business units' capabilities with SPSS Modeler is high. They no longer waste time on modeling and algorithms, meaning they are not coding any more. For example, segmentation projects now take one to three months, rather than six months to a year, as before.""It's a very organized product. It's easy to use."

More IBM SPSS Modeler Pros →

"The main benefit is the ease of use. We see a lot of engineers in our site and customers that really like the way the tools are able to work with the people.""IBM Watson Studio consistently automates across channels.""Watson Studio is very stable.""Stability-wise, it is a great tool.""For me, the valuable feature of the solution is the one that I used, which was Jupyter notebooks.""The system's ability to take a look at data, segment it and then use that data very differently.""Technical support is great. We have had weekly teleconferences with the technical people at IBM, and they have been fantastic.""It stands out for its substantial AI capabilities, offering a broad spectrum of features for crafting solutions that meet specific requirements."

More IBM Watson Studio Pros →

Cons
"If IBM could add some of the popular models into the SPSS for further analysis, like popular regression models, I think that would be a helpful improvement.""The standard package (personal) is not supported for database connection.""The platform that you can deploy it on needs improvement because I think it is Windows only. I do not think it can run off a Red Hat, like the server products. I am pretty sure it is Windows and AIX only.""​I would like better integration into the Weather Company solution. I have raised a couple of concerns about this integration and having more time series capabilities.​""It would be good if IBM added help resources to the interface.""It's not as user friendly as it could be.""Customer support is hard to contact.""I think mapping for geographic data would also be a really great thing to be able to use."

More IBM SPSS Modeler Cons →

"The main challenge lies in visibility and ease of use.""More features in data virtualization would be helpful. The solution could use an interactive dashboard that could make exploration easier.""I want IBM's technical support team to provide more specific answers to queries.""Some of the solutions are really good solutions but they can be a little too costly for many.""The decision making in their decision making feature is less good than other options.""I think maybe the support is an area where it lacks.""We would like to see it less as one big, massive product, but more based on smaller services that we can then roll out to consumers.""Watson Studio would be improved with a clearer path for the deployment of docker images."

More IBM Watson Studio Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Having in mind all four tools from Garner’s top quadrant, the pricing of this tool is competitive and it reflects the quality that it offers."
  • "If you are in a university and the license is free then you can use the tool without any charges, which is good."
  • "It is a huge increase to time savings."
  • "The scalability was kind of limited by our ability to get other people licenses, and that was usually more of a financial constraint. It's expensive, but it's a good tool."
  • "When you are close to end of quarter, IBM and its partners can get you 60% to 70% discounts, so literally wait for the last day of the quarter for the best prices. You may feel like you are getting robbed if you can't receive a good discount."
  • "It got us a good amount of money with quick and efficient modeling."
  • "$5,000 annually."
  • "This tool, being an IBM product, is pretty expensive."
  • More IBM SPSS Modeler Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Watson Studio's pricing is reasonable for what you get."
  • "IBM Watson Studio is a reasonably priced product"
  • "IBM Watson Studio is an expensive solution."
  • "The pricing is generally reasonable and straightforward but can vary significantly depending on the specific workloads in use."
  • More IBM Watson Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Compared to other tools, the product works much easier to analyze data without coding.
    Top Answer:The platform's cloud version needs improvements. The process to access workflow could be user-friendly. It could be easier to log in and manage security levels. Additionally, it needs to be more… more »
    Top Answer:From an improvement perspective, I would say that if the deployment environment and IBM Watson Studio's environment are separated, then it would be good. I would like them to be one and offer users a… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    3,065
    Comparisons
    2,425
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    372
    Rating
    7.3
    10th
    Views
    3,203
    Comparisons
    2,111
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    426
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SPSS Modeler
    Watson Studio, IBM Data Science Experience, Data Science Experience, DSx
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    IBM SPSS Modeler is an extensive predictive analytics platform that is designed to bring predictive intelligence to decisions made by individuals, groups, systems and the enterprise. By providing a range of advanced algorithms and techniques that include text analytics, entity analytics, decision management and optimization, SPSS Modeler can help you consistently make the right decisions from the desktop or within operational systems.

    Buy
    https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-modeler/pricing
     
    Sign up for the trial
    https://www.ibm.com/account/reg/us-en/signup?formid=urx-19947


    IBM Watson Studio provides tools for data scientists, application developers and subject matter experts to collaboratively and easily work with data to build and train models at scale. It gives you the flexibility to build models where your data resides and deploy anywhere in a hybrid environment so you can operationalize data science faster.

    Sample Customers
    Reisebªro Idealtours GmbH, MedeAnalytics, Afni, Israel Electric Corporation, Nedbank Ltd., DigitalGlobe, Vodafone Hungary, Aegon Hungary, Bureau Veritas, Brammer Group, Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, InSites Consulting, Fortis Turkey
    GroupM, Accenture, Fifth Third Bank
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University23%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company9%
    University9%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company22%
    Insurance Company11%
    Marketing Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Educational Organization7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business71%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    IBM SPSS Modeler vs. IBM Watson Studio
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM SPSS Modeler vs. IBM Watson Studio and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM SPSS Modeler is ranked 12th in Data Science Platforms with 38 reviews while IBM Watson Studio is ranked 10th in Data Science Platforms with 13 reviews. IBM SPSS Modeler is rated 8.0, while IBM Watson Studio is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM SPSS Modeler writes "Easy to use, quick to learn, and offers many ways to analyze data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Watson Studio writes "A highly robust and well-documented platform that simplifies the complex world of AI". IBM SPSS Modeler is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, KNIME, IBM SPSS Statistics, RapidMiner and Dataiku, whereas IBM Watson Studio is most compared with Databricks, Azure OpenAI, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, Google Vertex AI and Cloudera Data Science Workbench. See our IBM SPSS Modeler vs. IBM Watson Studio report.

    See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.