We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for MDM and ManageEngine Endpoint Central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Remote Wipe and Autopilot is one of the best features."
"One of the main features of the solution is it allows the management of many devices in different ways."
"Intune's security features for Apple iOS and Mac OS are helpful. We can check enrollment, manage public and private settings, and manage the organization's data using security key features."
"It is a stable solution."
"The ability to switch between Affinity and non-Affinity enrollment is great."
"The initial setup is not overly complex or difficult."
"Conditional access helps me control uncontrolled access."
"Internet-based access with security is what I have found to be most valuable. It is also a stable and scalable solution."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of MobileIron UEM are tunneling and enterprise integration."
"The company provides great customer service."
"It's effective in what it is able to achieve and it's easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is that everything is in one place, which makes it easy to manage."
"The most valuable in Desktop Central is the way it is tightly coupled with the rest of the modules and the entire gamut of ManageEngine."
"In terms of technical capability, it is doing very well. It is doing better than other industry products. It is at a place where we can compare it with Microsoft products. Its scalability is also good."
"The stability is great."
"The centralized control of all of our Windows hardware that this solution offers has been most valuable to our organization."
"The ability to patch my servers and endpoints is the most important for me. However, this feature is more pronounced in ManageEngine Desktop Central."
"The solution's most valuable features are its patch management capabilities, especially for third-party applications, along with quick and easy configuration and deployment processes."
"Page management and ADA integrations are the most valuable features of ManageEngine Endpoint Central."
"All of Desktop Central's features are valuable, especially its simplicity."
"They should make it easier to order it, however, that's generally true for everything from Microsoft."
"In the next release, I would like a feature to be able to properly lock down the device. For example, if an attacker or somebody steals the phone, you can be sure that the pin cannot be broken."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see some kind of analytics report."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"China blocks Google and Google Play Store, which makes installation challenging. Microsoft Intune is a company software, which has to be installed to the app portal or Microsoft Software Center."
"Intune lags all of its competitors in terms of report generation."
"It would be nice to have a location tracker for the mobile device management tool. I'm not sure if it exists but hasn't been configured or if it's missing, but we've been unable to utilize the location features."
"Due to the abundance of features, there's a lot to organize, which makes managing and setting up the solution challenging. The setup is immense, and it would be good to see improvement in this area."
"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."
"The integration between the MobileIron and Advanced Neurons isn't completely in sync, and we're still working on that."
"MobileIron UEM could improve the monitoring of devices."
"UI needs an upgrade, feels very outdated."
"The interface is complicated and not very easy to use."
"ManageEngine Desktop Central is very limited. When you scan your system, it will only recognize Microsoft Windows Defender and BitLocker."
"The pricing could be a bit better."
"Even when it shows Java as up-to-date, it might not be. So, to make it better, they should improve the accuracy of Java patch reporting."
"Improvement of the chats on the web communication through the WAN would be helpful."
"ManageEngine Endpoint Central’s scalability could be improved."
"The solution is expensive."
"I would like to see them come out with a SaaS version of the product in the future."
"The pricing is lower than other well-respected solutions in this category."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Neurons for MDM is ranked 7th in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 5 reviews while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 3rd in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 60 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for MDM is rated 7.4, while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for MDM writes "Great customer support which is imperative but lacks language support for non-English speakers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". Ivanti Neurons for MDM is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Ivanti Avalanche, Jamf Pro, IBM MaaS360 and Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management, whereas ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl. See our Ivanti Neurons for MDM vs. ManageEngine Endpoint Central report.
See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.