We performed a comparison between Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac and Kaseya VSA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date."
"The tool is a stable product."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"The website development section is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"When compared to what we were previously using, one of the most appealing features is that it combines remote control, patch management, and software management into a single portal."
"The most valuable features of this solution are automation, inventory, and patch management."
"The backup tool is highly useful, offering a fast and efficient way to retrieve and restore data."
"The training that we received was quite good."
"The solution was scalable."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ability to offer control remotely to its users and provide patching capabilities to users."
"As a small IT shop, the weird feature that the VSA has that I have not found anywhere else is they have these little colored dots that tell you the status of the machine. Is it offline and powered up? Is it actively being used? Is it idle? A lot of our clients ask us to do things for them, but, of course, they don't really want us to be underfoot. So we always look for, "Hey, there's an idle machine. We can work on that one now." And to say it makes it easy, we can do that at a glance. In any other tool we've looked at, you have to go several layers deep to see if the machine is in use, and you could spend your entire day just trying to find a machine that was idle, whereas, with Kaseya VSA, you can tell at a glance."
"Being able to connect to client computers without them necessarily needing to be there and being able to put in the patches and manage different information systems is valuable."
"The tool needs to improve its visual system."
"The better way to improve the solution is by working on an area where it lacks, which includes the migration part."
"The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."
"I believe we should include a VSA license to provide complete endpoint management."
"The way it is laid out can be improved. If it could be a little more intuitive, it might be a little bit easier. Sometimes, it is hard to find features because they're called something weird, or they're in an interesting location that you wouldn't have thought that they'd be in."
"The technical support of the solution is an area with shortcomings that needs improvement."
"There is room for improvement in the remote control strengths."
"The stability of the solution is good but it can be improved."
"Sometimes, the product misinterprets the functionality of a machine."
"The audit and KNM tools could improve."
"The product's user interface is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is ranked 15th in Patch Management with 4 reviews while Kaseya VSA is ranked 4th in Patch Management with 29 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is rated 9.0, while Kaseya VSA is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac writes "With good website development capabilities, the solution also provides exceptional stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaseya VSA writes "Single portal management, cost-saving, with thorough technical support". Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is most compared with Ivanti Security Controls, whereas Kaseya VSA is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, ConnectWise Automate, NinjaOne, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services and Datto Remote Monitoring and Management. See our Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Kaseya VSA report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.