We compared Microsoft Configuration Manager and Microsoft Intune based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Microsoft Configuration Manager is praised for its efficient system management and robust security controls, while Microsoft Intune is highly valued for its device management capabilities and integration with broader enterprise systems. Users appreciate the flexibility in managing policies with Intune, while Configuration Manager users highlight its customizable reporting and remote access. Both products received positive feedback on customer service and support, with Configuration Manager offering competitive pricing and Intune demonstrating cost-effectiveness. Areas for improvement include enhancing user interfaces and improving software performance for both products.
Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager offers efficient system management, seamless software deployment, comprehensive inventory tracking, customizable reporting, robust security controls, and convenient remote access capabilities. Microsoft Intune provides the ability to wipe data and reset devices, excellent visibility into connected devices, integration with broader enterprise systems, control over user access to websites, and easy-to-use interfaces. Both products have their own strengths and valuable features.
Pricing and ROI: According to user feedback, both Microsoft Configuration Manager and Microsoft Intune offer reasonable pricing and flexible licensing options. Users find the setup process of Intune to be straightforward, while Configuration Manager is praised for its pricing structure and licensing terms., The ROI from Microsoft Configuration Manager was perceived as favorable based on user feedback. However, Microsoft Intune demonstrated positive ROI with effective cost management, increased productivity, secure device management, streamlined workflows, and seamless integration with existing systems. Users highlighted significant time savings, enhanced user experience, and improved security measures, making Microsoft Intune a valuable investment.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Configuration Manager could benefit from enhancing its user interface, navigation, and layout to streamline tasks. It should also improve reporting, alerting, integration with third-party apps, and device compatibility. On the other hand, users suggest that Microsoft Intune should focus on improving its user interface, speed, performance, customization options, and troubleshooting features.
Deployment and customer support: Based on user feedback, the duration required to establish a new tech solution with Microsoft Configuration Manager can vary widely. Some users spent three months on deployment, while others spent a week on setup. However, for Microsoft Intune, some users spent three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, while others spent a week in total for both phases., Microsoft Configuration Manager's customer service is highly praised for its helpfulness and responsiveness, while Microsoft Intune's support is commended for prompt assistance and knowledgeable staff. Both offer reliable and dependable support.
The summary above is based on 127 interviews we conducted recently with Microsoft Configuration Manager and Microsoft Intune users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"It saves a lot of money when you can install things automatically and they are installed the exact same way on every computer."
"It is a good choice for deployment that performs very well."
"Microsoft Configuration Manager helps with patch management."
"Patching is the main feature because SCCM is made to control the entire environment without manually interpreting. So it is good to use for patching."
"I like Mircosoft's technical support. Microsoft has a few updates, like some of the critical KBs. They are published within the interval time, and in case of an escalation on the client missions, we will raise a ticket with the Microsoft team. They will create a hotfix or a critical update. They will chat with us, and that is one thing I like about Microsoft. Whenever any issues occur at my organization, they will help you out soon as possible within the SLA."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to deploy patches to nearly all applications."
"Endpoint Manager is valuable to our organization because it allows us to connect to our enterprise from remote locations securely. The most useful feature is its robustness and scalability. It is highly scalable and flexible, allowing us to use it in various environments. Additionally, we can specialize the policies related to each device group. This ensures that each group has access to the applications they need for their work and non-work hours."
"You can remote control or RDP. That has been the most valuable because we can go into one console and can get to anything we want. Instead of going to all these different consoles, we centralized everything."
"It is very easy to use. It has a very easy interface."
"The most valuable features in Microsoft Intune for me are application deployment, Defender deployment, and asset management."
"The dashboards, the security, and the customization capabilities work very well for us."
"It has a useful device management feature."
"We have not experienced any bugs or glitches with this solution."
"It helps implement conditional access policies to restrict mobile users from accessing potentially dangerous emails."
"The overall user experience is quite nice. I have no complaints from end users regarding their devices enrolled in Intune."
"We have found the solution is capable of scaling."
"I want the system to provide some dependency relations. I would also like to see the relationship between different machines."
"The solution is on-premises. The cloud version of the product, if a person needs to be on the cloud, would be InTune, which already exists as an option. SCCM doesn't need to offer cloud features for this reason."
"The main thing is that SCCM has to become an appliance instead of a server. When I say appliance, it has to come preconfigured so that it is drop-shipped into the enterprise and then you activate the feature sets that you want. It should pull down all the latest binaries. Once that is all there, it should have a discovery tool which goes out and discovers the assets within an enterprise. If the server, workstation, and applications are all coming from the same vendor, why not have the vendor do this work for us and automate it as much as it possibly can?"
"In spite of us being a premier customer we find the support unsatisfactory."
"The cost of the product can be improved."
"The solution could improve the functionality for automating, license management. Additionally, more and better-looking reports are needed."
"The App to upgrades to the server needs to be improved."
"I currently need to increase my compliance level in the patching processes which this solution could improve on."
"The solution could be improved by the opportunity to connect third-party application databases, such as Chocolatey or another setup store, to Intune."
"There is room for improvement in integration and security as well."
"It would be better if I could integrate it with my core group policy. I would like to have a group policy in my current environment, which has strict control, but those things are still missing. Although it has maximum compliance and security, it's not available on-premise."
"The closest Microsoft Intune can be to GPOs, the better. There needs to be more granularity on application deployments. However, they have done better recently with the application deployments."
"There are a few security features that are not available in Microsoft Intune, when compared to other products."
"It just doesn't handle software updates well at all by itself. You need to be a scripting wizard to make those happen properly, or you use third-party tools. The Windows feature updates are very difficult to implement. I would like to see a proprietary built-in remote control tool. I know that they have Team Viewer integrated, but it is not seamless. It would be nice if they had a seamless remote desktop capability directly from the Intune console."
"They need to add more group policies. Intune currently does not have many group policies that you can deploy. Its reporting, which is very limited at the moment, also needs improvement. It will be great if they can add report customization. Its stability needs to be improved. Sometimes, when you register a device in Intune, it doesn't show up instantly on the engine portal on the admin side. They need to provide better support for complicated issues. They also have a long turnaround time."
"It would really be helpful to have the option to manage server operating systems as well, like Windows Server, at least. That way, we could scrap the use of SCCM, which requires a lot of on-premises infrastructure."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Configuration Management with 78 reviews while Microsoft Intune is ranked 3rd in Configuration Management with 165 reviews. Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, BigFix, Tanium and AWS Systems Manager, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Entra ID and Microsoft Purview Data Governance. See our Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Microsoft Intune report.
See our list of best Configuration Management vendors.
We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
