We performed a comparison between N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne, Kaseya, TeamViewer and others in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)."The most valuable aspect of N-able Remote Monitoring & Management is it provides an all-in solution for the different solutions."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"The reporting for this solution has been most valuable."
"The integrated backup and the scripting are good."
"I like being able to get a picture of what's happening on a computer. I can just click on it, and I can see the CPU usage and the memory usage and what services and programs are currently running. I can connect remotely to a computer. All these are very useful."
"We like that this solution is in real-time, it gives us real-time monitoring."
"The details and the reports they provide are what I like, especially the details for almost the whole computer and the OS type."
"The network device is a good feature. In a place where you need to monitor your firewall switches, you can add an RMM tool and monitor it on the same screen on the same setup for the same client. Network devices are very good."
"I like the historical reporting of observer metrics."
"This solution allows us to standardize all of the reports for monitoring the network, so it helps a lot for auditing purposes."
"The stability has been great."
"The tool helps to monitor Windows servers. It offers alerts from a central location."
"It is a user-friendly product that requires almost no maintenance."
"This is a product that does more generally than any of the competing solutions."
"I enjoy its integration with the Microsoft Active Directory functions, which means users, computers, or other group policies can connect with Windows Active Directory."
"The product has helped our organization with in-depth monitoring."
"The SentinelOne integration is not great."
"It would be great if the pricing model could be improved and the solution was more affordable."
"I would like to see notifications sent with SMS."
"We haven't had it for very long, and we're finally getting comfortable with it. The biggest improvement probably would be a little more clarification. It has few exclamation points or attention-getters when there is a computer that doesn't have the up-to-date patches, etc. However, it's not specific in terms of what you need to do. Sometimes, it says it requires a reboot, and you reboot it, but the same message still shows up. Sometimes, the messages that it gives you about how to resolve an issue are not very easy to understand."
"There is quite a bit of delay on the portal where we receive monitoring information from the endpoint agent on the remote device. Sometimes it gets stuck with no live response from the device, and you have to refresh the portal just to make sure that it's projecting the right information."
"There are disconnection issues sometimes."
"The reporting could be more customizable. RMM pulls a vast amount of data, but you need to filter through it to get a decent executive report each month. I'm pulling reports all day through the XML file and such to get the information our executive needs. They don't want a 34-megabyte Excel spreadsheet, but the overview only provides limited information, like a basic breakdown."
"Kaseya is a similar product and they have easier scripts. If you want to deploy one software to 100 machines, we need to dig into it and then we need to create the script and work with the support team and then we can deploy that particular script. The pre-built scripted is the one thing that I would definitely like to have improved."
"It'll help if they can provide real-time or closer to real-time monitoring."
"Regarding certain issues in the solution, it can be difficult to generate reports if we have a program that is not user-friendly for reporting. While this is not necessarily negative, we may need to use another solution."
"I would like to see them improve their network monitoring."
"Third-party tools have had to be created to make SCOM management pack creation more efficient and effective. However, this weighs down the application as it just adds a resource requirement, which is ballooning the size of the necessary storage and all that for essentially substandard components."
"In a future release, they should add email notification alerts."
"We didn't know the solution enough, and therefore, it took a while to set everything up correctly. There was a learning curve."
"There could be more integration of SIM in the solution."
"It could use some system enhancements, such as better dashboards."
More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is ranked 5th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 13 reviews while SCOM is ranked 3rd in Event Monitoring with 78 reviews. N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is rated 8.2, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management writes "User-friendly and allows you to do different activities on a single interface, and gives you visibility into multiple devices, but its reporting interface and report generation could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is most compared with N-able N-central, Zabbix, ConnectWise RMM, NinjaOne and PRTG Network Monitor, whereas SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and ManageEngine OpManager.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
