We compared Zabbix and PRTG Network Monitor based on our users' reviews across several parameters. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Zabbix is praised for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, customizable alerting system, and extensive reporting options, while users appreciate PRTG Network Monitor for its user-friendly interface, scalable performance, and detailed reporting capabilities. Zabbix's customer service is highly rated, while PRTG users find the software more intuitive and quicker to set up. Both products offer reasonable pricing and valuable ROI, with opportunities for improvement in user interface and customization features.
Features: Zabbix offers customizable alerting system, extensive reporting options, and comprehensive monitoring capabilities. PRTG Network Monitor is praised for its ease of setting up, scalability for larger networks, and ability to tailor alerts based on specific criteria.
Pricing and ROI: Zabbix does not have setup costs, making it easy to get started, while PRTG Network Monitor has minimal setup costs. Users find Zabbix's licensing flexible and suitable. PRTG Network Monitor offers good value for the cost with scalable licensing options. Zabbix users have reported positive outcomes and benefits. PRTG Network Monitor users found the software cost-effective and efficient, providing valuable insights for network management.
Room for Improvement: Zabbix has room for improvement in user interface, scalability, and performance, while PRTG Network Monitor could enhance its user interface, customization options, alerting features, and integration capabilities.
Deployment and customer support: Users find PRTG Network Monitor quicker and simpler to deploy and set up compared to Zabbix, which may require more time and effort for implementation. Zabbix's customer service is praised for its promptness, effectiveness, and expertise. Users appreciate the knowledgeable and responsive support team. PRTG Network Monitor's customer service is also highly acclaimed for prompt responses, helpful guidance, and a reliable support team.
The summary above is based on 77 interviews we conducted recently with Zabbix and PRTG Network Monitor users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"It's very easy to manage when you've got time to do some work on it: things like adding devices, adding groups, adding sensor clusters, and being able to clone and move stuff around."
"The most valuable aspect is the diverse range of features it offers."
"I found PRTG Network Monitor very useful for troubleshooting and monitoring the utilization of either the network or server."
"It is great for service level agreements and can comply fully with internet monitoring or any interface."
"The solution is very easy to use and the web provides information with ease."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"My opinion is that this solution is not very expensive."
"The most valuable feature of PRTG Network Monitor is the different monitoring probes available."
"The flexibility of this solution is amazing."
"It has improved our server performance monitoring overall. We know right away when there are problems. It has built-in statistics, so we can go back and see if there's spiking. We can check what's happening every day around the same time and check the configuration to see if there's something that's running and needs to be fixed."
"The integration with third-party tools and the alerts are most valuable."
"The most valuable feature is network traffic monitoring."
"The solution's design has recently changed and it is visually pleasing with more color, for example, there is blue, black, and white."
"Zabbix is scalable."
"There is less computing power needed for scaling."
"I really enjoy network traffic triggers that allow us to check traffic threshold from ISP."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Technical support is an area with concerns in PRTG Network Monitor, where improvements are required."
"I am not sure the solution is giving me all the needed feedback that we need. When something goes off on our IT infrastructure, it does tell me. However, it would be nice if it gave more intuitive information, e.g., the hard drive has gone up by 60 percent in an hour."
"The remote probes seem to be a little bit buggy at times. They just stop working or they say they can't communicate. What we tend to do to is install the remote app onto the servers that we use. That seems to clear it up."
"The only sort of limitation is the actual probes. So, if you don't have enough probes on there, you can over flip them and cause the WMI sensors and SNMP sensors to sort of overload. Sometimes, they might timeout for a minute, but they do come back."
"When using PRTG Network Monitor it is beneficial if you have prior experience with it, the user interface could improve."
"I know we're going to move to Docker applications and I understand that PRTG does some monitoring regarding this. I do not know if it is complete. If it's not yet complete, it's something they should consider improving."
"We have had a few issues with the web elements, as far as the dashboard. With the dashboard, it has to be manually refreshed. Occasionally, we reboot the server, or at least web services, due to the web aspect."
"We would like to monitor certain aspects of the user experience. We should be able to analyze the cause of end user experience, bad or good, so we can do some research and development on our own."
"The GUI could be more intuitive. Also, we'd like streaming telemetry. Zabbix might have this feature, but I haven't seen it yet. It took us a long time to get started because the documentation isn't very descriptive. We had to go through various sources like YouTube and forums to get this solution working."
"Sometimes, the documentation is a little bit written in Estonia – a country in Europe. The language barrier and translation to English can sometimes make it difficult to understand what they're trying to get at. It's just a language thing."
"Zabbix isn't very good at automation just yet."
"Zabbix is not easy to configure, and upgrading is also an issue."
"I would like for this solution to be more cloud-friendly."
"My company wanted to do an exercise command to access IT from Cameroon. They wanted to access an FSS to a second host with second equipment that was on another coast but it is not possible on Zabbix to do it. They want to directly access from the front-end of Zabbix to access a prompt in Zabbix to an access terminal. In the front-end, there is no way to do that. That would be an important improvement."
"Improvement is needed as per customer requirements."
"There are a lot of areas for improvement, specifically in the dashboards and reports functionalities."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
PRTG Network Monitor is ranked 5th in Network Monitoring Software with 96 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. PRTG Network Monitor is rated 8.2, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PRTG Network Monitor writes "It's an all-in-one solution, and net flow is included in the licensing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". PRTG Network Monitor is most compared with Centreon, Nagios XI, SolarWinds NPM, ManageEngine OpManager and Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios Core and Elastic Observability. See our PRTG Network Monitor vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
