We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Grafana is a flexible, open source solution that is highly valued for its user-friendly interface, customizable graphs, and accurate application metrics. It is also praised for its moderate pricing and a positive return on investment. While both BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Grafana have valuable features, Grafana's good integration and visually appealing graphs make it a popular choice and the preferred solution.
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management is easily scalable."
"It has provided us with a single location to host all events to be viewed/monitored by our NOC. This has greatly helped them to streamline their processes."
"The solution provides visibility to our infrastructure, how it is, the resources we are monitoring, and quick updates when it has any problems. We have integrated it with ServiceNow to open instances."
"The most valuable features of the solution are alert management, alert generation, and event management."
"The major advantage of the product is estate management."
"It is breadth. It covers so many different technologies which can roll up into a single console."
"The most valuable feature of BMC TrueSight Operations Management is the dashboard presentation server."
"The event management tool builds correlation logic and protection algorithms into a field of events that is valuable when a data center goes down."
"The most valuable aspect is customization. There are many customizations possible, so I like that."
"The most important feature of Grafana is its alarm formatting capability."
"We like the alert features."
"It is easy to change and move virtual servers."
"The most valuable feature of Grafana is the ease to build dashboards from observability construction. Additionally, the page services and integration are good."
"The comparison feature is very good."
"Grafana is able to connect with multiple data sources, unlike Elasticsearch."
"The dashboards are the most valuable features."
"I think the ease of deployment needs to be looked at. It would be great if the deployment was faster and easier."
"Deployment requires lots of resources (servers). It has too many consoles."
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management could improve the reporting."
"Reporting would be an area for improvement in TrueSight... We have almost 800 customers today on TrueSight and just under 10,000 assets. We need to be able to give a customer some information. If the customer's product fails, they'll ask us, "Did it have a problem beforehand?" We have all those events and we know all the problems it had beforehand. We have to be able to give them access to that kind of reporting. That's an enhancement that we need."
"I would really like to see out-of-the-box support for monitoring uninterruptible power supplies."
"In our company, we faced some issues with the solution’s application endpoint, IP, and the physical location of the transactions."
"The stability of BMC TrueSight Operations Management needs improvement. My organization's infrastructure is vast and implemented based on BMC recommendations, but the solution needs to be optimized for large-capacity infrastructure."
"The solution is overly complex."
"The solution should include online support."
"I had issues with the solution's configuration part."
"The solution has room for improvement with a better API to help automate the construction of the dashboards easier."
"There is a need for improvement in automating daily monitoring reports, especially when alerts are triggered due to system downtimes or fluctuations."
"I have a problem with Grafana in the area of documentation."
"The service dashboard is very hard and needs improvement."
"Lacks in-depth graphs and sufficient AI."
"There are not a lot of plugins for financial market monitoring."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 17th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 49 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and New Relic, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.