We performed a comparison between Broadcom Clarity and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have a centralized view that we can have in our delivery and business organizations."
"Broadcom Clarity PPM is a high-value product that helps users become productive. It's a very stable, scalable, and fast platform, even from a self management perspective."
"We just put all the data into one place and hopefully, after we have accurate data, we can make more decisions based on real data rather than gut feeling."
"The solution is technically fine and user friendly."
"We have flexible scrum teams, developers that will serve on one scrum team for a few sprints or for a project. Being able to track where people go with the resource management features, and making sure that our teams are fully staffed, is important."
"It is a scalable, easy-to-deploy, and user-friendly solution for enterprise businesses."
"You can identify resources by roles."
"Clarity PPM's strongest features are project and resource management."
"The most valuable feature of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is incident management."
"The interface is user-friendly. It's one of the most user-friendly on the market, and the most complete."
"The solution is scalable."
"It's a very complete solution."
"We like the status report feature. It is something really valuable."
"We mainly use the solution to support operations and align our ITSM operations with our business goals. This involves coordinating between our application development, support teams, and network engineering teams. When there's an issue at the product or network level, we raise a ticket, and our team works together to resolve it."
"The demand management tool is very strategic because it helps assess risk, gives you a visual of different demands, and rates those values."
"The product is quite convenient and user-friendly."
"I'd like to see blueprints. I'd also like to see the user interface simplified, and to have a lot of templates available on each blueprint."
"Build more capability and unification into the reporting."
"When you are going to a more collaborative based approach, PPM does not support that."
"I would really like a modern UI. I do not want to get on a user interface and feel like I am in the 1990's."
"Maybe we need to bring some financial executive reports to our directors and executives. Maybe we can improve the use of Jaspersoft."
"I think there's still a little bit of opportunity that we can do some stuff better in relation to the financial part of it; just that easier integration, that look and feel. Our project managers, and obviously finance people, love to interface and use of Excel. The more we can get CA PPM to behave in a similar way, which we're already starting to gain in that path, will be absolutely fantastic."
"It would be good for them to work on the user interface to make it more interactive."
"I want to see integration for SMS functionality."
"ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management could improve by having more Agile features. Other solutions, such as Rally have more."
"The cost could be improved. The solution is quite pricey."
"When we originally set it up, we had some kind of success manager free of charge, and now it's an additional charge over and above what we're paying."
"The interface isn't user-friendly."
"I would like to see some artificial intelligence incorporated into the management functions."
"The timing reporting module, and how it's used is a bit difficult to understand. Everything related to project management is quite extensive. It needs to be simplified. At first, our users didn't want to use it, because it seems a bit complex."
"The product comes with little options out of the box."
"Dashboard interface is limited functionally and not very user friendly"
More ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Broadcom Clarity is ranked 2nd in Project Portfolio Management with 136 reviews while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 27 reviews. Broadcom Clarity is rated 8.0, while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Clarity writes "A dynamic solution with a lot of great out-of-the-box calculations, but integration with reporting utilities is a bit painful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management writes "A very strategic demand management tool that visualizes risks and ratings in a bubble chart". Broadcom Clarity is most compared with Microsoft Project, Jira, Planview Portfolios, Smartsheet and monday.com, whereas ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Jira Align, Microsoft Project Server and monday.com. See our Broadcom Clarity vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.