We performed a comparison between Jira and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Jira queries can be used for different types of deployment automation processes."
"The informatics is the most valuable feature. It captures what we need."
"The most valuable feature of Jira is that it's a well-known tool that many people are familiar with."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The task management aspect of Jira is pretty pure. They have a lot of great plugins that really expand your options."
"JIRA's technical support is absolutely fantabulous. I had used it in the past when I was working at my previous organization. And when we wanted to link it with a framework, they helped us out with the API we were looking for."
"Jira is a pretty capable product, and a lot of features are valuable. We value being able to set up separate projects and configure teams in them, set up sprints, and manage our sprints with its history tracking. These are all very useful features. It has been a very popular product for our work."
"It's easy to use, and it also offers excellent notifications."
"The PPM module is an excellent service."
"The most valuable feature of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is incident management."
"The stability is excellent. ServiceNow is one of the leading platforms when it comes to stability."
"The technical support is pretty good. ServiceNow has consistently provided excellent assistance."
"We mainly use the solution to support operations and align our ITSM operations with our business goals. This involves coordinating between our application development, support teams, and network engineering teams. When there's an issue at the product or network level, we raise a ticket, and our team works together to resolve it."
"The interface is user-friendly. It's one of the most user-friendly on the market, and the most complete."
"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very intuitive to set up."
"We like the status report feature. It is something really valuable."
"There needs to be a way to export a user story."
"I would like to have a future-proof idea of the cost and the roadmap for my class."
"Sometimes it takes time to load the data."
"The user interface is very detailed right now. It could be simplified if they consider targeting the user experience."
"The tool should improve its pricing."
"Jira could improve by making the user interface easier to use and the functionality could be better. While we are managing multiple sprints and other elements of the projects, it's very difficult to manage the labels and other aspects."
"The solution needs more integrations with Azure DevOps OnPrem."
"Slow when integrating with other components."
"Dashboard interface is limited functionally and not very user friendly"
"ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management must improve its interface, which is not very interactive or user-friendly compared to other tools like Zendesk. The real-time reporting feature doesn't help much in our decision-making process. It's quite complex to use and lacks the rich features needed for visualization. Overall, I find it to be very poor."
"ServiceNow needs to invest more in integration. That's the only thing. It could always extend its portfolio a little bit."
"The portfolio managed is good for IT, but it's not good for non it's not necessarily great for construction projects, such as the building of physical infrastructure."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"The only issue for us is the pricing. It’s quite high in comparison with the competition."
"I would like to see some artificial intelligence incorporated into the management functions."
"The user interface could be more modern."
More ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 266 reviews while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 27 reviews. Jira is rated 8.2, while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management writes "A very strategic demand management tool that visualizes risks and ratings in a bubble chart". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and OpenText ALM / Quality Center, whereas ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira Align, Microsoft Project Server, Smartsheet and Broadcom Clarity . See our Jira vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.