We performed a comparison between Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and OpenText Diagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We receive good transactions from it with good graphs, as well, documenting the activities of total visitors on the site. We can pull the reports and provide them to the client, as required."
"Now, we know we have a problem, because there is a primary layer of alerting or metrics monitoring put in place, that is the good part."
"The triage can find the root cause for pent up issues."
"I found the solution's end-to-end analysis and flexibility most valuable."
"CA APM is very scalable and used in a clustered environment because it supports more than its technical capacity."
"Helps the development team to fine-tune and proactively manage the application."
"In terms of stability, it has been stable so far."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is its user interface."
"The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects."
"For banking and telecom solutions, it's been quite useful."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Diagnostics is the information reported from an application that has timed out. For example, when you're Googling, or you're booking a ticket for Burj Khalifa here, the longest tower in the world, there are situations where the system can time out. There are times when you might not receive a response on the payment gateway or you are not able to find the reservation. The customer only receives the information that the session has timed out."
"The APM upgrade procedure is a bit complicated with compatibility issues which can emerge like between agents and EM/Collectors."
"There is no auto flow diagram, and the alert mechanism is not as good when compared to other tools."
"Stability could actually be helped because it is a wrapper or an agent on our system. If we are having a bad day in production or if other resources are being utilized, then we will get get gaps in our monitoring system."
"They can make it easier to configure."
"The upgrade was complex. The documentation could have been a little bit better, but other than that, it was okay."
"The stability could be more reliable."
"We enountered stability issues. They were mitigated by performance tuning within infrastructure."
"The front-end representation should match other competitors such as AppDynamics."
"The GUI and metrics of Micro Focus Diagnostics can be improved. The metrics the solution gathers can be limited and could be enhanced by giving more details."
"The interface could be more user friendly."
"The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI."
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 22nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 161 reviews while OpenText Diagnostics is ranked 34th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 8.0, while OpenText Diagnostics is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Diagnostics writes "Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training". Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, VMware Aria Operations for Applications, New Relic and BMC TrueSight Operations Management, whereas OpenText Diagnostics is most compared with Dynatrace. See our Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. OpenText Diagnostics report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.