We performed a comparison between Camunda and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I think that the positives of Camunda Platform are that our customers can start with the free version. I think it is the most important."
"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."
"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"It has an open BPM"
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"Documentation can be improved."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform, Appian and Bizagi. See our Camunda vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
