We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"The support team responds fast."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"There's a lot of online knowledge on the solution, to the point where new users can basically teach themselves how to use the solution."
"It offers integration with several Microsoft products, including SharePoint and Outlook, in my opinion, is a huge plus."
"Of all of the solutions I evaluated, it was the easiest to use and deploy."
"There is value in being able to collect and compare information in real-time to present alternatives for correcting vulnerabilities."
"The solution is very straightforward. Its context is obvious and everything is easy to understand."
"The features I find the most valuable are the 365 and Microsoft applications integrations and the automation."
"The model that allows you to establish flow automation is getting a lot of traction from the customer side. It offers a lot of flexibility."
"It is easy to use."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"We'd like more features and less to no coding."
"The editor in the Web browser could be improved because it can be difficult to implement the commands in the buttons."
"In some cases, PowerApps would have some limitations in terms of the data, the number of transactions, and so on, but for a normal solution, it would be enough."
"They probably need to improve intelligent document processing."
"The connectors are the main components that reference the data sources, and these need to be improved."
"The set up of the solution could be simpler."
"This tool doesn't have an internal database. It only relies on the data layer of Microsoft Cloud."
"The product could be improved by making it a production application and enabling the export of apps."
KiSSFLOW is ranked 14th in Rapid Application Development Software with 12 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews. KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". KiSSFLOW is most compared with Camunda, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform, Appian and OutSystems, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our KiSSFLOW vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.