We performed a comparison between DX Unified Infrastructure Management and ManageEngine OpManager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It gives an alarm when there's something going on, not just when there's an expected spike that happens every night on a server."
"One of the things that I like about DX Infrastructure is that the topology is good enough to see what is happening in the infrastructure. You also get alerts if something is happening in the network. There are many features and benefits. It is serving our customers in knowing exactly how their network is performing in terms of reliability. It also helps them in planning the capacity. They know how much bandwidth the branches are consuming."
"The number of probes available. Out of the box, I believe about 200 probes are available. And, if there's a probe that is not available, you can write one. You can also go to the communities and suggest, and based on demand, CA will write one for you."
"It is easy to implement."
"You can scale it pretty much however way you want to as long as you have the servers to throw at it."
"Technical support is great."
"Having all of our information within one tool set; our alerts, our monitors, and the things that our operations team needs to function."
"You can integrate clouds, hybrid infrastructure, and on-premise infrastructure into one product."
"The uptime and monitoring are valuable to us because we need to monitor the uptime of our services, the memory, and the CPUs."
"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash."
"We find the networking aspect of this solution to be the most valuable."
"Device backups are smooth and managed centrally, with a nice dashboard, so you can quickly see the status."
"Some of the useful features are NetFlow and analytics."
"The features we found most valuable in ManageEngine OpManager are the probe server and reporting because they're pretty good features."
"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."
"The alerting feature has improved our organization. We can create multiple alerts and refine them to how we need to use them."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Stability."
"We want to see more investment in the UI and the dashboard."
"There should be wider coverage of storage infrastructure."
"Making a GUI with criteria such as selection by robot/hub/probe etc."
"Within this product there are individual probes, and each of these probes doesn't always necessarily output the same kind of information into our database. So when we try to collect what's called QoS data, from one probe we might get a ton of information, lots of good stuff that we can use in our database, but then from another probe, we might not get so much or we might not be able to pull the things that we want to."
"It is a little complex to use versus other softwares."
"It would be good to implement views showing the aggregated status graphically."
"We would like the navigation of this solution to be more user friendly for our system administrators."
"There needs to be improvements to make the solution capable of supporting more devices, and it would be good to see an option for automatic deployment."
"The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now."
"It would be great if there were some sort of artificial intelligence feature which would help us make improvements in the network once we find an issue, and do it automatically."
"What I'd like ManageEngine OpManager to improve on is artificial intelligence. In particular, the machine learning feature should be integrated with the sensor flow. Doing this will give leverage, especially when you look at other products such as the Cisco DNA Center. When a switch goes down, I should be able to build on the correlation of other physical devices it's connected to so that I can integrate that with my CA CMDB. The ManageEngine OpManager team needs to draw a long-term roadmap where that feature becomes an integral part of the solution because right now, machine learning in ManageEngine OpManager is a long process. The solution doesn't have MLS search and I want to see ML being developed and applied for CA CMDB to greatly reduce the burden of tying everything. For example, if I have a data center switch that goes down now, I should know what server it's connected to, and when that switch goes down at twenty-four ports, I would get twenty-four alerts for different devices plugged in. I should be able to make a correlation that the major problem lies in the switch and not with the twenty-four elements connected to that switch. That is where machine learning should come into play and the ManageEngine OpManager AI should indicate "This is where the root of your problem is." It could be difficult, but this is a feature that should be improved or added to the solution."
"I would like to see more enhancements made to the product."
"We had some stability issues at the outset that have since been resolved."
"ManageEngine OpManager could improve the default dashboards that are available. We are not able to customize them easily and they do not give us the information we need unless we customize them. You need to have the technical knowledge to be able to do it, the customization should be easier."
"ManageEngine OpManager can improve by having better updates for critical issues."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More DX Unified Infrastructure Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
DX Unified Infrastructure Management is ranked 36th in Network Monitoring Software with 120 reviews while ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 13th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews. DX Unified Infrastructure Management is rated 8.2, while ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of DX Unified Infrastructure Management writes "Easy to set up, simple to use, and offers great technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". DX Unified Infrastructure Management is most compared with SCOM, DX SaaS, DX Spectrum, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and Zabbix, whereas ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, Nagios XI and Centreon. See our DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. ManageEngine OpManager report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.