We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and ServiceNow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is easy to integrate."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"ServiceNow is a very powerful tool that can perform a lot of different functions."
"Remote access is most valuable."
"The solution integrates well with other products."
"It's great to do statuses or to review tasks."
"It allows us to filter the data, create graphs, and get detailed reports."
"In financial management, this platform has the infrastructure allowing us to expand the way we want to. For example, it gives you many business rules and budget models that you can use to optimize your workflow. It does not put you in a box. Additionally, integrating this solution with other platforms is extremely easy to do."
"In terms of the most valuable features, it's nice to have everything in one place. Things are easy to follow up on. ServiceNow provides that workflow. I know at some level it is in the pipeline and then if I need to follow up, everything's there. Those are the key benefits of ServiceNow."
"You can put information in or export it out quickly, which is very useful when you have weekly or monthly reports."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"One thing I don't care for is the reporting and the way it functions."
"The contract module is quite rudimentary and doesn't support contract line items."
"Their GUI could be updated."
"We are struggling with the scheduling part, but it doesn't necessarily mean that it is a ServiceNow issue. It could be the way we have configured it. We don't have it configured in a way where you can schedule a support call with our end users. We are looking for more automation in the box and the chat feature."
"Where it could be improved is Discovery. This may sound odd since I just praised the value of ServiceNow Discovery, but improvements to its automatic detection, the breadth of devices, and the depth of devices covered, as well as keeping up with new technologies, are all essential."
"The licensing needs to be divided into tiers in order to attract lower-level users."
"There should be greater integration with other enterprise applications. We're using Microsoft, Oracle, and other applications, and it would be good to have a greater integration on some of the immediate hiccups that you have with these services. It doesn't mean that when we have a problem with using another application, ServiceNow should be able to fix it, but ServiceNow should be able to alert us to things. There should be a bit more automation or integration."
"It's missing monitoring capabilities."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews while ServiceNow is ranked 4th in Rapid Application Development Software with 212 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "A stable and scalable solution that has excellent features and is useful for collecting data and building KPIs". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, Mendix and OutSystems, whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM, Appian and IBM Maximo. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. ServiceNow report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
