We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"Allowed us to develop and quickly release with confidence using cloud technologies."
"This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process."
"The solution offers excellent workflows."
"Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable."
"There is a feature to accelerate the development so that business analysts can directly create their user stories and assign the task to the developers."
"The robotic process automation has increased the confidence of business users."
"Fast prototyping."
"While Pega technical support is okay, it also depends on the issues you need help with and who your contact is with Pega."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"One of the areas of this solution that could be improved would be to advance the low code features of the application itself. We would also like to use the same platform to build any application, even if it is not necessarily defined as a functionality needed by a BPM."
"I believe that Pega's strategy when it comes to the UX part is not that great currently as compared to the other emerging BPM tools in the market."
"They need to support the solution better, at this time the company does not have enough support."
"An area for improvement in Pega BPM is security. It's secure, but it still has a lot of vulnerabilities. Pega BPM is robust, but it still needs some improvement performance-wise."
"The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there."
"The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed."
"This is an expensive solution."
"There have been some performance scalability issues. Suppose you want to add more users. You go from, say, 800 users to 1,500 users, and sometimes that creates issues for which there is no clear explanation. To fix it you have to escalate it with customer service and sometimes the response is not up to the mark in resolving those issues."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 8th in Rapid Application Development Software with 57 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Mendix and OutSystems, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and ARIS BPA. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.