We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and ServiceNow Now Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup of the product is easy."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The integration with other tools is pretty good."
"It is an absolutely scalable solution."
"The main reason that people use ServiceNow is that performance is very good."
"We have seen a big improvement in the experience that we want to create for our end users."
"In ServiceNow, the best features are the reports. We have more options there."
"The simplicity is great."
"Now Platform's best features are collaboration, configurability, and customizability."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The cost has room for improvement. It is currently expensive."
"There are a few areas of concern when it comes to the product's support team where improvements are required."
"The solution’s AI and NLP features could be improved."
"The Robotic Process Automation features are not mature enough. ServiceNow could work toward that because we can leverage RP only from this platform."
"The basic reporting system is rather static."
"They should reduce the solution's cost and make it more affordable for buyers."
"ServiceNow Now Platform's technical support needs to improve."
"It's not quick or cheap."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews while ServiceNow Now Platform is ranked 11th in Rapid Application Development Software with 36 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6, while ServiceNow Now Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Now Platform writes "A highly scalable product that covers multiple areas, like ITSM, ITOM, and ITIL". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, ServiceNow and CucumberStudio, whereas ServiceNow Now Platform is most compared with ServiceNow, Microsoft Power Apps, OpenText AppWorks , Appian and Hyland OnBase. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. ServiceNow Now Platform report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
