We performed a comparison between LogMeIn Central and N-able N-central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the security aspect, that I can glance down and see quickly who's up to date on patches, and who has virus concerns."
"The ability to remotely access machines with no user intervention required at the remote terminal. Other software we used needed someone to click a link and do a download for me to provide support. Now, with LogMeIn Central, I can get in and fix things while they are away from their desks."
"Unattended remote assistance."
"I have called for help to their technical support, and they have been extremely helpful."
"I would not want to tell other companies about it because it is so powerful, it does so much, and it makes me look so good."
"I like the options for multiple displays. The unattended access is very useful, but it can also be misused. So, it is something you have to be careful with."
"Provides remote access, allows me to get inside our network to be able to fix problems."
"The alerts are helpful."
"I like the remote connectivity, reporting suite, and patch management module."
"It's a very robust product. They're continuing to invest and put new enhancements into the product. They're very open about what their roadmap is, which is very good for us because then as a business, we can plan."
"The solution's service is good."
"The support is at a good level. So normally, we can always get to a solution when we are stuck with some monitoring problems that we encounter."
"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."
"I have had issues where LogMeIn has not been useful, then we have not been able to work that day. This happens probably two or three times a year."
"Do not use the technical support."
"The initial load is terribly slow and often has delays with the login page loading."
"The solution is expensive as hell."
"It is easy to get locked out, which is something that needs to be improved."
"Our clients are having issues with printing."
"Sometimes it just fails to load."
"I do not like the antivirus."
"The integration with other applications could be better."
"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."
"N-able N-central could improve the remote access, my technicians have complained about it. They have used other free tools instead to compensate, such as TeamViewer. Additionally, when using remote access on the web, it is lacking reports."
"The solution's overall integration should be improved."
"There is room for improvement in the development of custom monitoring services."
LogMeIn Central is ranked 10th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 19 reviews while N-able N-central is ranked 7th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 5 reviews. LogMeIn Central is rated 8.6, while N-able N-central is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of LogMeIn Central writes "Fast with an easy setup and a good interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N-able N-central writes "User-friendly graphical user interface and offers versatile functionality". LogMeIn Central is most compared with TeamViewer, NinjaOne, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Atera and Kaseya VSA, whereas N-able N-central is most compared with N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management, NinjaOne, Atera, ConnectWise Automate and Kaseya VSA. See our LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.