We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure App Service and Salesforce Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure App Service is that it's a PaaS. I also like that it supports Docker and multiple frameworks so that you can work on Java, Ruby on Rails, PHP, and Python."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure App Service is customization. It provides the building block from its modularity. You can add what you need with the appropriate code."
"Overall, all of the features are very good."
"Debugging using Application Insights is a valuable feature."
"The technical support from Microsoft Azure App Service is good."
"One of our reasons to use the product is its cloud service. Our usage is mainly on the cloud and we like the benefits that we can get from the cloud. You can easily do the literal shift of your application easily. You can jump into the cloud very quickly."
"One valuable feature of Azure App Service for us is its integration with Azure DevOps, which we heavily rely on in our development process."
"It allows you to host your App Service on Azure and provides the ability to bypass online."
"Intuitive to work with and the overall fundamental of the platform is very strong."
"he solution has improved over the years and the inputting of opportunity information is done a lot better and the GUI is good. The ability to customize dashboards and other elements was useful, we were able to move things around, for example, the forecasts. Most of the cells and input places were set, but we can customize the view and what we were looking at, such as on a daily, or weekly basis."
"It is very modular in approach. It is very light, and it can be used on various devices. It could be used on an Android phone or a laptop, which makes it good for the sales team on the road."
"We haven't had any issues with stability so far."
"The keyword search helps me in finding stuff quickly. So, I don't have to click around a lot."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the unit coordination between sales and marketing when it comes to lead management."
"The reporting tools are very solid."
"The presentation is clear and easy to comprehend."
"From an IoT use case perspective, we're all good, however, we should have additional plugins."
"Sometimes customer service and support can be challenging."
"I want more transparency in billing. It would be better if we could understand and control the billing to customize it. Also, Microsoft should provide more guidance about the widgets and subsets of various products. The Microsoft portfolio is so huge that it's sometimes difficult to choose the correct option. There's always a chance we are paying more than necessary."
"The pricing is average. It could be lower."
"Lacking somewhat in template data flows."
"If you're on the cloud, you just get a web interface without much detail for additional configuration or the authority to configure the root or system-level configuration."
"The solution is quite expensive. If you need more features, you need to pay for them."
"The outbound connectivity is not great."
"Their reporting needs to be improved. It should be easier. I don't know how, but it needs to be easier."
"I would like to have integration with Google."
"I think the interface should be enhanced and more user-friendly."
"Reporting could be better. Reporting is Excel-based, and it has sucked since the inception of the company. That's why I was excited about the fact of them bringing MuleSoft into the fold and Tableau."
"The management of Salesforce could be quite a task. Old and unusable contacts can add up over time. If I could wave a magic wand, it would be to initiate a self-cleaning feature."
"Integration needs improvement."
"The biggest challenge we had was the cost and the licensing."
"Salesforce introduces a lot of products and sometimes rebrands them, causing confusion. They acquire products like W and retain their names, creating confusion in the market. This confusion isn't related to the product's functionality but rather its positioning and rebranding. For instance, what was once known as Community Cloud is now referred to as Experience Cloud. This can be confusing for business leaders."
Microsoft Azure App Service is ranked 6th in Mobile Development Platforms with 38 reviews while Salesforce Platform is ranked 3rd in Mobile Development Platforms with 82 reviews. Microsoft Azure App Service is rated 8.4, while Salesforce Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure App Service writes "A solution with great server management and helps improve performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Salesforce Platform writes "Reliable with good reporting and custom dashboards". Microsoft Azure App Service is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Pega BPM and Appian, whereas Salesforce Platform is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Microsoft Azure, Appian and ServiceNow. See our Microsoft Azure App Service vs. Salesforce Platform report.
See our list of best Mobile Development Platforms vendors and best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.