We performed a comparison between NTT-AT WinActor and UiPath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."
"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."
"It is easy to set up drag-and-drop features to configure workflows."
"UiPath is very easy to use. We are able to automate manual processes with bots, so the work gets done in a very short time."
"It's just easy. It streamlines our activities very well."
"We enjoy the constant innovation. It's coming out with new things that we can use and new features all the time."
"UiPath has saved the company costs."
"The support that we are receiving from UiPath is superb."
"The ease of building automations is a 10 out of 10. It automates our tasks faster and gives us positive and accurate results."
"The UiPath Academy was pretty helpful for us in the initial stages."
"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."
"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."
"There are cases where because of the UiPath upgrade, some of the activity features get upgraded, and the processes that we have designed using an older version of UiPath don't run after the upgrade. In such scenarios, we have to downgrade and use only the older version. We have seen issues in that part. It's good to add new features, but that shouldn't impact the existing development of processes that we have done for our end users."
"I have had issues with the selectors. I face problems during image capture, and I need to update them. It is not something that I can rely on."
"I would suggest that they improve the UiPath Connect Enterprise because the planning stage is the most crucial in the RPA life cycle."
"On-premises deployment of UiPath requires a significant amount of RAM for optimal performance."
"They could always continue to add new features, however, I don't have anything specific in mind right now."
"Some of the areas around the administration aspect of UiPath, which is what I have been mostly working with over the past few years, can be better. From an organizational standpoint, some of the guidance there could use some work in terms of helping COEs know how to grow and how to take control of their organizations as they spread."
"It would help if there was functionality whereby you could upload something like a flow chart and the solution could process steps according to the flow chart."
"UiPath is very slow for scraping."
NTT-AT WinActor is ranked 27th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews while UiPath is ranked 1st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 765 reviews. NTT-AT WinActor is rated 7.0, while UiPath is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of NTT-AT WinActor writes "Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath writes "Facilitates end-to-end automation, has good AI and document understanding capabilities, and saves us costs previously spent on manual tasks". NTT-AT WinActor is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, whereas UiPath is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Robocorp and Pega Robotic Process Automation. See our NTT-AT WinActor vs. UiPath report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
