We performed a comparison between OpenText Operations Bridge and ScienceLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Event Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."From our monitoring perspective or from a visibility perspective, HPE UCMDB is a must have. It's an amazing piece of software."
"OpsBridge has good event correlation facilities and root-cause identification algorithms."
"The Performance Manager provides great insight into our systems' performance."
"We haven't faced any stability issues. There hasn't been any crashes or glitches."
"The event correlation is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The preloaded rules and ways to monitor your systems are a must."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It's not complex at all."
"The most valuable feature is that everything can be consolidated into one dashboard."
"The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support."
"The solution provides good infra-monitoring features."
"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."
"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."
"Power packs."
"Best feature of all is detailed monitoring of services, processes, ports and SSL certificates and or web content."
"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."
"The most valuable features of ScienceLogic are AI and machine learning."
"The initial setup is a little bit complex."
"The solution is overall "heavy", requiring multiple servers, even without HA."
"I'm not aware of areas that need improvement."
"The setup process can get a little bit complex."
"pology-based event correlation does not work well with NNM events."
"What needs improvement in Micro Focus Operations Bridge is its resource heaviness because you need many resources to deploy and support it. It's a good solution for larger organizations, but for small businesses, not so much."
"The pricing is a bit expensive for smaller companies."
"Implementation could be improved."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."
"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."
"They should improve their support process and add chat."
"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring. We definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications. At least the ones that are market leaders, such as SAP, Oracle, and others."
"The product is not user-friendly."
"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."
"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."
"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."
OpenText Operations Bridge is ranked 8th in Event Monitoring with 44 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 5th in Event Monitoring with 42 reviews. OpenText Operations Bridge is rated 7.8, while ScienceLogic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText Operations Bridge writes "Good event correlation capabilities, promotes a self-service approach to monitoring". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "Great integrations, power flow, and good support". OpenText Operations Bridge is most compared with SCOM, OpsRamp, BMC Helix Monitor and Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, SolarWinds NPM, Datadog and Zabbix. See our OpenText Operations Bridge vs. ScienceLogic report.
See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors, best IT Operations Analytics vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.