We performed a comparison between OpenText Service Manager [EOL] and ServiceNow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Atlassian, BMC and others in IT Service Management (ITSM)."It helps to register things, to see the changing parts, and to correlate incidents."
"The solution will streamline productivity and also improve automation. That would bring efficiency as well the ability to handle a big number of enterprise-wide service needs. Productivity and collaborative capabilities are some of the key benefits."
"Service Manager does what it should, but it's quite outdated."
"It gives us better understanding and control of service management."
"Micro Focus Service Manager is fine. It's a good solution for small accounts with minimal reporting. Micro Focus is a good option because you don't have to worry about the budget."
"The solution is simple to set up."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Service Manager's best features are flexibility and customizability."
"It's actually easy to understand."
"A workflow automation platform that's reliable, performs well, and has good reporting and integration."
"I find almost all the features valuable. It can do nearly everything except make your coffee, as my colleagues always say. It's got pros and cons, like every software, but the good thing about it is that it has a very structured approach."
"We can keep track of incidences. There is a bucket where we keep all our information, and it enables communication between stakeholders. It helps us collaborate with each other."
"There are many expansions available."
"The look and feel is a valuable benefit for adoption."
"ServiceNow is one of the few easiest platforms you can integrate with products like Ansible to automate your workflows."
"One feature of ServiceNow that is important is the workflow engine. From my perspective [as a consultant] the power to be able to structure processes, represent workforce management for organizations, and the visibility provided by the reporting are additional top features."
"There should be some front desk provided or some options to let our users serve themselves, because we have about 5000 servers and 400 applications."
"We aren't able to take emails that come in and turn them into tickets, especially when it comes to attachments. When an email has an attachment, like a screenshot, it is a very cumbersome process, and it does not work very well. I shouldn't have been paying technicians to cut and paste attachments from an email into the ticketing system. It should do that automatically. Other solutions are able to do that. This is something that needs to be improved. Test manager and knowledge management areas are probably amongst the worst parts of this solution. We try to use this solution for knowledge management, but it is not user-friendly. Therefore, it has limited ROI as you need to spend time to try and fully capitalize on the knowledge management system."
"Customization can be difficult at times because scripting is often required."
"The product's technical support services need improvement."
"Micro Focus Service Manager is not very great. It would be better if it had more features. When it comes to features, BMC tops the chart. When it comes to usage, people use BMC more."
"Service Manager is at the end of its life. The architecture, performance, and look are all way behind."
"The interface could be better."
"Their end-user interface and technical support features could be improved."
"Data access is a bit difficult, where you sometimes wish you had a relational database for some queries. The flexibility of data access in general is a bit on the low end. Of course, there is flexibility in some ways, but when I need a certain combination of data for some report, it can become a challenge."
"Very expensive."
"Its stability and pricing need improvement."
"The RPA needs improvement. That's a new area for them that they're just entering into now."
"The interface is not user-friendly."
"The pricing of the solution could be better. It's a bit high."
"For me, there's a real opportunity, especially within the IT Service Management suite, to give a much better overall view of the workflow that individuals have across the different applications. At the moment, a lot of information is quite siloed in the different tables in ServiceNow."
"I know that discovery tools are not meant to be simple, but somehow, if they could make it more simple and robust, that would be great."
More OpenText Service Manager [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is ranked 12th in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 48 reviews while ServiceNow is ranked 1st in IT Service Management (ITSM) with 212 reviews. OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is rated 7.2, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of OpenText Service Manager [EOL] writes "A solution that works out of the box. The solution's real strength is its ability to change for your organization's infrastructure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "A stable and scalable solution that has excellent features and is useful for collecting data and building KPIs". OpenText Service Manager [EOL] is most compared with JIRA Service Management, OpenText Service Management Automation X (SMAX), BMC Helix ITSM and IBM Maximo, whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM, IBM Maximo and Appian.
See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors and best Help Desk Software vendors.
We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.