We performed a comparison between Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and QuickBase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."The object storage and managed backup solution are valuable."
"Just having the many options and features offered by the product through the cloud is a major benefit."
"Technical support is good. We are partners with Oracle so we are always speaking with them."
"The strength of this product is that they have many good database options, compared to other vendors."
"Frankly speaking, I've been very impressed with the stability the solution offers. Everything is working very well at the moment, and we haven't had any issues or faced any bugs or glitches."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the high level of performance for the databases."
"The solution offers many features and it is a complete replica of our data center."
"Oracle Cloud is reasonably scalable - I'd rate it seven out of ten."
"It has helped streamline and simply track status and collection of data from suppliers and other internal departments."
"The usability of QuickBase largely depends on how you design your workflows within the platform. If you keep them simple and straightforward, it can be a highly usable product."
"It provides a well-organized method for overseeing everything, especially considering the remote work aspect."
"I am impressed with the product's automation which makes everything easy."
"The reporting tool: It helps in data analytics to provide the solution more efficiency."
"QuickBase is an excellent product and it is very easy to get support."
"QuickBase reminds me when a software license or a hardware support contract is near expiration so that I can initiate our company's procurement process in time and not miss a deadline."
"Allows users have anytime/anywhere access."
"The packaging part of the software needs improvement. It lacks customization abilities for users. Giving them VMs for machine learning or running their own programs like Azure and Amazon, for example. Things like scalability based on the requirement of the tools. Oracle still lacks these kinds of things. For example, if you need a VM from Oracle, you need to pay for a monthly fee. They started developing containership but it's still at the initial stage and it's still lacking. They also need to develop integration between packages."
"The solution is expensive"
"In the next release, I would like to see more automation."
"Some of the features of this solution, such as the digital assistant, require extensive configuration before they are suitable for use. We would like these to be made more straightforward and to require less manual input."
"Lacking in additional PaaS services."
"The solution is expensive. So we try to use MySQL on AWS to push the data. The tool’s support could be improved."
"The functionalities could be simplified as it is a bit difficult to learn."
"The initial setup can be a bit complex."
"The improved developer interface in some areas can be difficult to use for complex items."
". For example, we need a third-party to create and save a document in PDF, MS Word, or MS Excel format. The document saving capability is probably the feature that we most often have to procure from an outside provider."
"Unfortunately, there is still no new report formatting available natively, and would still require 3rd party developers to help with that. ."
"The mobile app has improved, but it still needs work."
"The product works constantly to modernize the platform and they have made quite a lot of strides in that. I would like them to add additional features that would help us make API calls."
"It would be beneficial for the QuickBase team to focus on improving the integration of cloud-based storage platforms within their product. In use cases like ours, where QuickBase serves as a centralized source of truth for construction projects, having seamless integration with platforms like Dropbox or OneDrive would greatly enhance the product's capabilities."
"Access to more standard default layouts and sample builds would be useful, and access to more training on use and flexibility."
"Third-party integration -- they are working on it and I find their brand-new still-in-beta Webhooks very promising."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 3rd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 91 reviews while QuickBase is ranked 16th in Rapid Application Development Software with 74 reviews. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8, while QuickBase is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QuickBase writes "Reliable, user-driven platform, that is scalable". Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and Red Hat OpenShift, whereas QuickBase is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Sales Creatio, Oracle Fusion Service, OutSystems and ServiceNow.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
