We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"This is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The advanced direct control on offer is excellent."
"The advantage of the solution is that it has a console on the cloud and you can update the clients."
"I have found Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra to be highly scalable."
"They are constantly updating the solution against malware."
"The most valuable features are the solution's thorough detection and ease of use."
"It efficiently investigates security incidents."
"You can analyze any incident or malicious behavior. You can take action from within the EDR, and it can assist you in understanding how the attack was initiated or any malicious behavior in your environment."
"We like the dashboard, the console, the reporting. It's very easy to deploy."
"They offer the whole package. Remote monitoring and management (RMM) is included with it, which is pretty nice. They also have Windows patching and third-party patching. It was easy to use for protection. The containment engine was pretty nice for securing our environment."
"The product’s valuable feature is the remote control station."
"Auto Containment is a valuable feature."
"It is a very stable solution, making it an excellent product."
"Containment is the best feature of the solution."
"The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."
"It really protects and does its job. It totally blocked every attack attempt, and no attack attempt was successful."
"It's stable and reliable."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"The support needs improvement."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The solution is sometimes resource-intensive."
"The on-premises setup for Bitdefender sometimes faces issues with connectivity. Management of Windows Defender is a bit easier compared to Bitdefender."
"They were working on the encryption management for laptops, and if they complete it then it would be helpful."
"Using this product requires quite a bit of training, which is hard to get."
"I would like to see a remote desktop for installed endpoints so administrators can see what is on a user's screen or what a user is doing."
"They should improve the solution's patch management feature."
"Application Control should be available on the cloud."
"There was a bit of a problem deploying."
"The quality of the analysis and the product dashboard is a bit low compared to other providers."
"We'd like the solution to include advanced web filtering capabilities, similar to what Sophos offers."
"There could be MDRM features added to the product."
"The licensing fees are high. The company should work to try to lower them for the customer."
"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."
"The menu could be cleaned up."
"Would be good to have a better understanding of what it is that you've got in quarantine."
"Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."
More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is ranked 13th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 56 reviews while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 34th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 14 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is rated 8.6, while Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR writes "High-quality threat intelligence, including encryption and mobile device protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes "Great features, good patch management, and useful ransomware protection". Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), whereas Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Fortinet FortiClient, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and CrowdStrike Falcon.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.