We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and Mist AI and Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN."The most valuable feature is the ease of configuration."
"Stability is one aspect that I find very valuable."
"The access points and controllers are good."
"The initial setup is straightforward, and you need to spend around six to 10 weeks to set up one controller."
"It just gives you the ability to use it around the office without being tied up to an actual physical connection."
"Cisco Wireless WAN's most valuable feature is it is robust."
"I give the scalability a nine out of ten."
"The most valuable features are CleanAir, Rogue Detection, and the auto-calculation of RF."
"The tool's best part is the GUI. It is user-friendly and fast due to AI features. The solution can help you fix things with AI, which is impressive."
"The most valuable aspect is that they operate on small microservices, offering numerous open APIs that enhance the value of our Wi-Fi network. This flexibility allows us to optimize various aspects such as workforce planning and occupancy management. The platform is highly open in the market, providing robust APIs for seamless integration with other tools. Currently, we leverage these capabilities at a building site, incorporating IoT sensors to gather data. The collected data is stored in a centralized location, and we plan to use AI for analysis. This analysis will include insights on peak activity times, humidity levels, temperature variations, and other relevant metrics within the building."
"The Marvis feature of Mist AI, an artificial intelligence tool, is very useful."
"The cost is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"Has an extremely good feature set."
"There are several valuable features. One of them is Cibas, and another one is Marvis."
"I have a very good experience with the solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The triangulation feature can be used to determine where a person is in relation to the access point."
"The initial setup and deployment should be easier."
"The price has room for improvement."
"Documentation is an area that needs review. It should be more dynamic and it should be easier."
"Include more managing features within the product, rather than having to purchase them as extras."
"We have had some problems connecting to the internet with Cisco Wireless WAN, but it is not the equipment or configuration. Additionally, the integration with access control security could improve."
"The integration support technology should be improved."
"The pricing of the solution could always be better."
"The console interface is not very user-friendly. It's a bit complex and difficult to navigate."
"The solution doesn't provide mail notifications currently."
"There seems to be different versions of standards used in the wireless access points. In the future, it would be helpful if the solution could come up with some kind of universal standard for all devices and all access points."
"Sometimes it takes a lot of time for the access point to connect with the cloud."
"There is no local support for Mist in Brazil."
"Juniper should integrate all their dashboards instead of having separate dashboards...Since it lacks the integration of dashboards, Juniper needs to improve it."
"Configuration could be improved."
"There are some technical issues that may require attention"
"Mist AI and Cloud should be marketed more and focus on making partners in the industry."
Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews while Mist AI and Cloud is ranked 7th in Wireless LAN with 21 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while Mist AI and Cloud is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "Widely available and has a straightforward setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mist AI and Cloud writes "A combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Fortinet FortiExtender and Ubiquiti Wireless, whereas Mist AI and Cloud is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, ExtremeCloud IQ and Ruckus Wireless.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.