We performed a comparison between Jamf Pro and Kandji based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about JAMF, Microsoft, Kandji and others in Mobile Device Management (MDM)."Intune's unified endpoint management platform is invaluable."
"The conditional access policies that we set up are very useful."
"This product works very well for companies already using the full Microsoft suite."
"It has helped with compliance. It has helped to ensure that devices comply with the organization's policy. If they are not compliant and secure, they cannot access the resources."
"It helps implement conditional access policies to restrict mobile users from accessing potentially dangerous emails."
"The ability to block and erase remote devices is valuable to us, especially when those devices are lost."
"The solution is scalable. We currently have tens of thousands of users within our organization using the solution."
"In terms of technical support, you will get an immediate response."
"Jamf is stable, reliable, secure and you have lots of customization options."
"We were able to dramatically enhance our cybersecurity, and better support our users."
"We have been able to successfully manage applications and inventory within our machines."
"We can see every single Mac is on which macOS version so we can help users if needed to update their Macs to a saved and current version."
"I have been using Jamf Pro for a few years now, and I'm impressed with its functionality and ease of use."
"Patch management and associated policies help us manage and update our fleet's software."
"The self-service is invaluable to the user."
"We can put certain devices into smart groups based off of device name, department, etc."
"It's a very easy plug-and-play solution where you can just enroll the devices and choose the features you want."
"I would like some integration with the Microsoft reporting platform Power BI."
"The backend of Microsoft Intune needs to be improved. We have seen a little bit of delay as compared to other MDM solutions. That needs to be improved. A little bit more granularity should also be added"
"Intune has some limitations when it comes to application updates for third-party applications. You can schedule an update, but when it's a package setup, you need to supercede and replace it each time."
"It would be good if, in addition to the minimal patching and compliance, we could also use Intune for application deployment. For instance, if a device is not patched, Intune should have the ability to push not only a Microsoft patch but also other patches, such as a browser patch."
"The main disadvantage seen today is regarding Linux clients. We have a lot of development resources that have Linux on their clients, and we can't manage them on the same platform, as we do with other clients such as macOS and Windows. So, it should have support for Linux clients. It should also have better support for macOS."
"Lacks the ability to deploy more ways of management, managing devices and processing the policies."
"Microsoft Intune has a latency response time issue. The latency has room for improvement."
"The reporting needs to be a bit more interactive."
"I wish the inventory would have its own pane without having to do it as a search."
"I would like to have the ability to push scripts using MDM commands."
"It would be nice if Jamf added an onboarding tool integrated into Jamf Connect during the automated DEP enrollment workflow. It would also improve the user experience if Jamf integrated native macOS notifications, with the option to interact within the notification center."
"An easier way to deploy Full OS upgrades would be a great start."
"Jamf needs to get an inbuilt remote support tool to allow the admin to remote into machines. At present, you can use third-party remote apps, however, a Jamf one would be better."
"The on-going improvements & innovation that Jamf provides over time is something that needs to be maintained, as it is what is needed to fulfill a business & team need at the right time."
"There is still no feature for properly patching T2 Security Chip-enabled Macs."
"We face issues when we do not have a script and have to write a script, we need to create extension attributes."
"Kandji should give open customization."
Jamf Pro is ranked 1st in Mobile Device Management (MDM) with 103 reviews while Kandji is ranked 4th in Mobile Device Management (MDM) with 1 review. Jamf Pro is rated 9.6, while Kandji is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Jamf Pro writes "Customizable with a self-service portal and a good security posture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kandji writes "An easy-to-manage and deploy solution, but it should provide open customization". Jamf Pro is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl, Microsoft Configuration Manager and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), whereas Kandji is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Open EDR and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint.
See our list of best Mobile Device Management (MDM) vendors and best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Device Management (MDM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.