We performed a comparison between LeanIX and MEGA HOPEX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Architecture Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the tool’s integration and maps."
"The usability is very high. It almost looks like a Facebook for Enterprise architecture, it's pretty nice. It's HTML5 based. The repository is very easy. It has 10 different ways of sorting the objects you have in your architecture repository. Maintaining new data or to add data to your repository is very easy."
"Among the most valuable features are the easy-to-use interface and the ability to get quick results... Many tools that I have seen are great for technical people and for giving technical and business information as well, but they're not as friendly and easy as LeanIX... It works well for both technical and business users. It provides a good combination, enabling you to quickly put valuable information in for both technical and non-technical people and derive results."
"One of the product's most valuable features is its ability to configure hardware devices."
"The most valuable features are that it's user-friendly and the user experience. It's easy to map the fact sheets."
"I like LeanIX's ease of use in general."
"The solution has a very useful assessment tool that automatically populates from input data to produce a detailed analysis of customer's environments."
"The solution provides a single window view of business, application, data, and technology views of the IT ecosystem."
"The most valuable feature is that the software controls everything from a single management window."
"The tool is very simple and intuitive to use."
"The solution itself was easy to use."
"What I find the most valuable is the process workflow. It is really good."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities."
"The support experience in Latin America is great."
"MEGA offers a more integrated GRC platform to facilitate enhanced coordination between the functions of Risk, Compliance, and Internal Audit on a single platform solution - HOPEX."
"The initial setup was straightforward. With configuration, customizing or prepping the data and deployment, it took about one year to set up. We only needed two people to deploy and maintain the solution: one business architect and someone who specializes in customization and operations."
"Another area for improvement is that when you're starting to look into more advanced information, using the solution's APIs and its customizations, documentation for that specific aspect is not very good. There is not too much support built into the offering for that aspect, for a developer."
"Report generation could be more detailed. There are some shortcomings when creating reports. We can't create tag-based reports or go beyond basic technical reports."
"The initial setup has room for improvement."
"It's hard to predict the pricing of the system."
"They should improve the out of the box connectors that they provide. They should see if clients are really ready to adapt them."
"Not a ten because you always have that gap between complexity and easy to use. And the more complex the tool becomes, the more difficult it is to get the usability."
"The solution needs to incorporate a data patch tool that moves within and irons data."
"The solution’s API integration needs to improve. I would like to see a digital screen watch feature also in the solution."
"The initial setup can be quite complex at first."
"Better documentation and training would be helpful."
"It has a data domain where we load our data objects onto the tool but doesn't provide data governance capabilities such as cleansing or validating data."
"The tool usability is weak and it also has a high learning curve."
"We would like to see integration with other products, such as being able to use our workflow with SharePoint and Microsoft Office."
"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."
"They do tend to push people to their professional services, instead of helping the customers with their problems. I understand this is their business. At the same time, however, they need to work on fact sheets or offer some program to help the customers who want to implement it themselves and to make it run properly in their environment."
"Needs a friendlier import/export to other modeling tools."
LeanIX is ranked 1st in Enterprise Architecture Management with 17 reviews while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 36 reviews. LeanIX is rated 8.6, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of LeanIX writes "Streamlines the process of identifying apps nearing end-of-life or requiring retirement and facilitates informed decisions about app retention". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". LeanIX is most compared with ServiceNow, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, ADOIT, iServer and Avolution ABACUS, whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, ARIS BPA, Visio, Avolution ABACUS and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our LeanIX vs. MEGA HOPEX report.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.