We performed a comparison between MEGA HOPEX and Visio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's excellent for supporting decision-making."
"The most valuable feature is that the software controls everything from a single management window."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the reuse of common enterprise components and entities."
"We use the portfolio management feature heavily."
"The initial setup was straightforward. With configuration, customizing or prepping the data and deployment, it took about one year to set up. We only needed two people to deploy and maintain the solution: one business architect and someone who specializes in customization and operations."
"Customer support is fantastic. They are very helpful whenever we get on the line with the support team."
"It generates friendly websites and presents specific views of the enterprise (business, functional, applicative, technological, and infrastructure)."
"What's most valuable in MEGA HOPEX is that it follows the reference model where each component is defined. I also like the diagram consistency in MEGA HOPEX."
"The most valuable feature is that it is integrated with other tools in the Microsoft Office suite, as well as at the backend with products like SharePoint and Microsoft Teams."
"Architecture modeling software with satisfactory standard features. It's also stable and effective in facilitating communication with others."
"The product's initial setup is really simple."
"A lot of built-in templates are really phenomenal. They cut down the time when you're trying to get something out. They reduce the complexity that technical folks like to put into things that have to be given to technical folks."
"I like that once you create what you need, you can group that, at least within that drawing, and you have access to that new stencil object or that custom object throughout that drawing."
"Very interactive with an intuitive interface."
"I like the solution's ease of use and its the integration with different templates from a variety of manufacturers."
"It is stable. I have never experienced any issues."
"We would like to see integration with other products, such as being able to use our workflow with SharePoint and Microsoft Office."
"Scalability can be a problem sometimes."
"The interface must be improved."
"I would like to see more regular updates released."
"In my experience, I've encountered difficulties with consuming custom packages in MEGA HOPEX, which leads to redundant work when deploying them to production. This is an area where improvement is needed. While version six offers better UI and UX, resolving this issue should be a priority. I believe it's important to fully explore MEGA HOPEX's capabilities before suggesting new ones."
"The features are limited. I'm hoping in the future the solution will be bigger and include more items. Right now, overall, it needs more."
"The solution lacks additional models compared to other tools."
"Standardization is lacking. The Operational Risk Function will be more effective if it at a default level follows established Basel standards for Loss categorization, Risk Assessments, Risk Event categorization, etc."
"Something that needs to improve, is the interface interaction with other tools."
"Visio is not as scalable as other tools due to the proprietary restriction. You cannot customize it or scale it up like the way you do with Trello or Jira. Microsoft places restrictions on things that you can do with Visio."
"Visio could improve by simplifying the application to allow the business user more understanding. This will allow us to bring the solution deeper into the organization for use. It can be difficult to navigate and some users tend to rely on third-party applications for auditing, compliance, and policy configuration."
"The simulation is an area that requires improvement."
"I would like to see better integration with external data sources."
"The solution should be included in Microsoft Office 365. For some reason, it's not. It should be bundled in with everything else."
"The platform has limitations in managing aspects like repositories."
"The one particular thing which I would like to see improved is in comparison to other products in the market, and is still lacking in Visio, is publishing on a web application. For example, there is a freeware application business process modeling tool, Bizagi."
MEGA HOPEX is ranked 8th in Business Process Design with 37 reviews while Visio is ranked 1st in Business Process Design with 100 reviews. MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8, while Visio is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Interactive with good functionality and helps with productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visio writes "A software for drawing a variety of diagrams which include flowcharts, org charts, building plans, floor plans, data flow diagrams". MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Avolution ABACUS and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas Visio is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Bizagi, Visual Paradigm and IBM Blueworks Live. See our MEGA HOPEX vs. Visio report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.