We performed a comparison between MEGA HOPEX and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We use the portfolio management feature heavily."
"MEGA offers a more integrated GRC platform to facilitate enhanced coordination between the functions of Risk, Compliance, and Internal Audit on a single platform solution - HOPEX."
"The platform is stable."
"The dashboard on the homepage makes for an enhanced view at a glance of the various work functions applicable to the user."
"The solution is scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it's completely possible to do so."
"I find the IT portfolio management very valuable and helpful."
"It is very interactive."
"Every module sets up the same information in a unique repository."
"The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand because it's visually presented. It becomes easy to explain variants and what needs to change."
"We can use workflow manager to create forms."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"Process management/Process governance is what we think Signavio is very good at."
"The most valuable feature is probably the nature of it."
"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."
"A complete business project management suite which seems to open endless possibility."
"It is a stable solution."
"The solution lacks additional models compared to other tools."
"In my experience, I've encountered difficulties with consuming custom packages in MEGA HOPEX, which leads to redundant work when deploying them to production. This is an area where improvement is needed. While version six offers better UI and UX, resolving this issue should be a priority. I believe it's important to fully explore MEGA HOPEX's capabilities before suggesting new ones."
"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."
"They do tend to push people to their professional services, instead of helping the customers with their problems. I understand this is their business. At the same time, however, they need to work on fact sheets or offer some program to help the customers who want to implement it themselves and to make it run properly in their environment."
"MEGA HOPEX can improve process simulation in the BPA module. If the solution was better we would not have to use another solution for this purpose. Simulating scenarios in the future for the to-be processes is in demand. If we can have the simulation engine built inside MEGA HOPEX, we would not have to purchase another license or solution to integrate them with each other. This would be a great improvement."
"The product must improve integration with other tools."
"Better documentation and training would be helpful."
"MEGA HOPEX's problem is that it is expensive, but it's a fantastic tool."
"I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator."
"We would like a better way to give users the correct permissions for processes, whether to view or design."
"The tool's navigation could be improved."
"It is sometimes difficult to find the match between what is possible and what is wanted, or what is helpful with the product, so better documentation may assist in this regard."
"There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting."
"It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully."
"Typically, a business process management suite would cover the whole lifecycle, from discovery to optimization and operations. This is running on the process server and providing some kind of low-code environment for developing business solutions. I think the latter part is missing, where SAP Connector comes in. Specifically, the execution of processes is missing, where you would design forms to take orders. This is typically part of some development environment for the process server to run processes from out of the models."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager's UI is not user-friendly. Its pricing is also high."
MEGA HOPEX is ranked 8th in Business Process Design with 37 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 6th in Business Process Design with 58 reviews. MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Interactive with good functionality and helps with productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Visio and iServer, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our MEGA HOPEX vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
