We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Great for software update needs, operating system version updates, and security policy enforcement."
"We can securely manage both company-owned devices and personal devices enrolled in our BYOD program."
"It's very informative when there is an error. It allows us to backtrace where the error is and resolve that ourselves. It's a bit of a Swiss Army penknife. We find that it fixes most issues."
"It has a useful device management feature."
"We are using the mobile feature, and we are also using MDM to lock the devices, to push restrictions, et cetera"
"Microsoft's cloud comes with a lot of extra features that are free of charge."
"This product offers an alternative solution to other UEM (Unified Endpoint Management) solutions."
"Intune provides full visibility into all active mobile device users. If their devices are noncompliant with our security policies, I have the flexibility to update them remotely."
"Since deploying Desktop Central our endpoints are all updated. We use configuration management to deploy shortcuts to our users' desktops with ease. Also, we use configuration management to map logical hard drives to our users. Our users are very happy with how much ease IT can solve their problems."
"In terms of technical capability, it is doing very well. It is doing better than other industry products. It is at a place where we can compare it with Microsoft products. Its scalability is also good."
"All of Desktop Central's features are valuable, especially its simplicity."
"The most valuable in Desktop Central is the way it is tightly coupled with the rest of the modules and the entire gamut of ManageEngine."
"The stability is very good."
"The patch manager is good, and it's easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine Endpoint Central is the central management console. Additionally, inventory tracking is helpful for knowing where our assets are."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"Integration with Mac devices requires some improvement."
"There are items that require improvements. One is the controls from iOS."
"It needs certificate provisioning for S/MIME purposes."
"No option to do end-to-en macOS management. Slow implementation of policies."
"There is room for improvement in integration and security as well."
"Its configuration is fairly complicated. You have to do quite a bit of discovery to be able to deploy it for a customer. You have to ask them a lot of questions. So, its initial deployment is the biggest challenge. They should make it easier to deploy with the use of Wizards or something else. During the deployment stage, there could be profiles for the customers who are particularly wanting to use certain feature sets of Intune."
"It needs incorporation of Knox, ZeroTouch, etc."
"Intune's reporting and logging could be improved. When troubleshooting, it's difficult to collect the logs and determine what's happening. If I want to filter out the compliant devices, I can see it from the logs, but I would like the option to drill down further."
"Tech support is mediocre at best."
"The pricing could be a bit better."
"We are looking for a complete solution for patch management with central management and the cloud which ManageEngine Endpoint Central does not provide."
"I really feel like asset explorer should be a component of desktop central. That would make it the ultimate desktop management tool. This would also simplify the asset management role since an agent is already being deployed and assets could be added at the same time."
"I would like to have the option to install the agent remotely."
"The solution should be better at integrating with other solutions."
"Computer imaging is powerful but breaks frequently. The reason for this breaking is not clear and requires heavy amounts of attention to keep operational. There is a lot of room for this tool to do more but the reliability of this process should be focused on first to ensure core competencies are being fixed before more features are added."
"The reports provided by the product are an area of concern where improvements are required. The visibility provided by the reports is not very attractive."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 4th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 60 reviews while Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is ranked 12th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews. ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2, while Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl, whereas Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM. See our ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs. Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors and best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.