We performed a comparison between MEGA HOPEX and Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."The solution is scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it's completely possible to do so."
"It is very interactive."
"The initial setup was straightforward. With configuration, customizing or prepping the data and deployment, it took about one year to set up. We only needed two people to deploy and maintain the solution: one business architect and someone who specializes in customization and operations."
"The support experience in Latin America is great."
"HOPEX has a panel that offers various views. I think that is very good. MEGA has an app for integrating with a lot of apps. We help our clients integrate HOPEX with a different product like Apple Gateway, for example. I've been with the company for 15 years, and we connect with everything. Our clientele includes almost all of the banks in Mexico."
"The tool is very simple and intuitive to use."
"This is a complete package with all of the functionality that we need."
"Customer support is fantastic. They are very helpful whenever we get on the line with the support team."
"Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance helps with extra collaboration and ensures communication is within the framework."
"The tool's UI should be more user-friendly."
"The interface must be improved."
"The initial setup is a little complex."
"It would be great if this solution could integrate with other tools such as ITSM (ServiceNow) or CMDB."
"We have a very close relationship with MEGA representatives in Mexico, and we ask them why they don't offer impact analysis. For example, we have a server in the center and provide the client a view of what's in the peripheral area, like one cluster, application, process area, and services. We want to offer our clients that level of visibility with HOPEX."
"It takes a long time to learn how to use HOPEX. It's hard to work with it because the user interface is bad. For example, if you want to build a complex system diagram, you need a lot of knowledge to do this correctly and make it readable. In MEGA, you need to create a report and it takes a long time to publish it. The publishing is offline. With RDoC, everything is online."
"It has a data domain where we load our data objects onto the tool but doesn't provide data governance capabilities such as cleansing or validating data."
"MEGA HOPEX can improve process simulation in the BPA module. If the solution was better we would not have to use another solution for this purpose. Simulating scenarios in the future for the to-be processes is in demand. If we can have the simulation engine built inside MEGA HOPEX, we would not have to purchase another license or solution to integrate them with each other. This would be a great improvement."
"The product should incorporate more automation with the help of AI."
MEGA HOPEX is ranked 4th in GRC with 37 reviews while Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance is ranked 13th in GRC with 1 review. MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Interactive with good functionality and helps with productivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance writes "Helps with extra collaboration and ensures communication is within the framework". MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Visio and Avolution ABACUS, whereas Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance is most compared with RSA Archer, Proofpoint Email Protection, Barracuda Email Protection, Mine PrivacyOps and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention.
See our list of best GRC vendors.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.