We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and MuleSoft Composer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"MuleSoft Anypoint Platform's most valuable features are its observability and stability."
"I have found several things most valuable, including its very quick implementation that you can use a lot of out of the box templates, and lastly that it is a very mature product, especially in hybrid integration."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"Lacks intelligent management data and intelligent mappings."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"MuleSoft's release calendar is rather conventional with two major, two minor releases and hotfixes in between. The competition sometimes offer more rapid release cycles and provides improved and new functionality with a faster time-to-market."
"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 41 reviews while MuleSoft Composer is ranked 13th in Cloud Data Integration with 4 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while MuleSoft Composer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "Handles a wide variety of data sources and efficiently organizes and manages integration processes". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Zapier and Jitterbit Harmony . See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.