We performed a comparison between Symantec Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Users praised Symantec Endpoint Security for its regular virus signature updates and comprehensive administrator's console. Trellix Endpoint Security is highly valued for its easy administration options and reliability. Reviewers said Symantec Endpoint Security could improve its graphical interface, Linux support, and scanning capabilities. Reviews suggest that Trellix could reduce resource consumption and improve user-friendliness.
Service and Support: Some users said Symantec customer service was helpful but slow, while others have expressed general dissatisfaction with support. Some users have found the support for Trellix Endpoint Security helpful and reliable, while others have encountered ineffective assistance and communication problems.
Ease of Deployment: Some users said Symantec Endpoint Security was easy to set up, while others struggled with the installation. Deployment time varies depending on the customer’s environment. The setup process for Trellix Endpoint Security varies in difficulty, depending on the user's experience with McAfee and general technical expertise.
Pricing: The cost of Symantec Endpoint Security depends on the licensing terms and necessary security components. While some users find the price acceptable, others believe it could be more affordable. Some find Trellix’s price reasonable and competitive, while others believe it could be lowered.
ROI: Symantec Endpoint Security demonstrates strong stability and incident prevention, leading to reduced downtime. It offers a favorable return on investment. Trellix Endpoint Security provides significant time savings.
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"I like the malware threat control policy and USB blocker. In Symantec Manager, we use multiple available features, so we created firewall policies to prevent any malware attack from the network or device controls."
"I find it is the most reliable solution on the market."
"The technical support is very good. They have an Indian support team, so there are no delays in receiving support."
"Managing SEP is very easy, and also troubleshooting part is easily managed."
"The solutions' main features are patch management and security."
"The most valuable feature is the automated updating feature."
"The most valuable feature of Symantec Endpoint Security is the protection of our systems."
"The solution can be scaled to handle different threats."
"The solution is reliable."
"It has been protecting us for many years, and we hope it will continue to do so for many years to come."
"The initial setup is straightforward, not complex."
"The solution is stable."
"Threat prevention is valuable because most clients use other solutions like antivirus as part of web protection. I don't find that kind of solution useful."
"The endpoint protection and disk encryption features are the most valuable."
"McAfee EndPoint Security has a lot of good features that work well if they are implemented properly."
"When Intel acquired McAfee they worked on the protocol so that all vendors can work on the same platform. It's a very big improvement in McAfee. All McAfee products talk to each other. Other vendor's products can join this platform as well so it makes it more powerful on the enterprise side for McAfee."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"Its interface needs improvement. Its interface is very old, and it needs a new look. Other solutions, such as Sophos and BitDefender, have a better and more modern interface, whereas Symantec has had the same interface for a while. There has been no enhancement in the interface. They should update and provide a better interface in 2022 for a better user experience for their customers."
"I find the documentation on Symantec.com to be not very updated. It seems like Symantec focuses more on their product than on documentation."
"Its GUI needs improvement. It's good, but it needs to be improved in terms of management and reporting."
"I would like to see fileless attack protection."
"It could use more feature parity between what is offered with their on-prem console as well as their hosted console."
"They are lacking the visibility that you get in a heuristical, next-generation AI product."
"One suggestion I have for both regular and mobile would be to collect all the information about installed software, such as versions, and give that information to the manager to help with software management. That would be a huge advantage for everyone who administers these tools."
"Need to improved orchestration for broken clients fixes."
"I would like to see more integration with third-party products."
"It would be nice if the solution were to allow not just on-cloud management, but on-premises, as well."
"Sometimes, while installing the ePO, we were getting so many errors and I don't know why it happened."
"The platform needs improvement in terms of handling heavy databases."
"The price of the solution is high in Asia."
"While we are pleased with the endpoint solution, there should also be a separate one for the firewall."
"McAfee Endpoint Protection could improve the word control feature."
"They can improve its resource consumption, such as memory, and maybe provide better or smaller updates. It always takes a lot of resources, but it has been getting better. I have been using McAfee products for the last 20 years or so, and I know it is getting better."
Symantec Endpoint Security is ranked 5th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 140 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 95 reviews. Symantec Endpoint Security is rated 7.6, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Security writes "The solution has given us visibility into compliance within our whole system and helped us ensure everything is updated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". Symantec Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Micro Deep Security and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. See our Symantec Endpoint Security vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
I would look at Trend Micro's Endpoint Protection as well. The client is light weight and there are many features and benefits that comes with their service offerings. Some offerings are port security, Ransome ware scanning, Smart Scan and standard scan features which utilizes the processor of the workstations as opposed to having one server using it's resources to scan the client workstations. The firewall client also makes a great proxy server to restrict end user access to unapproved/untrusted sites. There is a really great messaging security server tool for exchange as well. They offer Hosted Email Security (It's bundled with the Worry Free Business Security Advanced Package) which acts as a pre-check or scanning buffer between the web and corporate edge network. Trend Micro also has protection for mobile devices as well.