We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security and Trend Micro Deep Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"The detection is great and the solution is constantly improving."
"The primary reason the solution is good is because of its ease-of-use."
"It has a very simple like multi-tenancy option and scalability is outstanding."
"What I like best is the integrated end-to-end security that works with the security information and events manager."
"The solution is stable."
"This product has the capability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices."
"It's easy to use and it's very powerful. It offers nice endpoint protection."
"I have found many of the features to be useful."
"It helps with virtual patching and IDS fetching."
"We've found stability to be great so far."
"There is no competition for this product, as no other product provides HIPS, host-firewall, and anti-malware together."
"The most valuable feature of the product is vulnerability detection."
"DLP, Data Loss Prevention, and the complexity of how we manage the console and how this client, or this tool, will notify us when there is something going wrong within the server and endpoint, is good."
"Trend Micro gave our security teams a certain degree of comfort by just having it in the background, as they have familiarity with the product."
"In addition to providing our clients a view of what's happening in their data centers, it also does virtual patching in the data center. It enhances the security in the data center big time."
"They release timely updates and have efficient prediction features for threat detection."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The solution is not stable."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"It takes about two business days for initial support, which is too slow in urgent situations."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The security of this solution needs improvement."
"It didn't work well for some of the use cases. We have different use cases for each entity. Their support is also not good and needs improvement."
"The local technical support could be better."
"The solution has problematic encryption, which needs reforming."
"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."
"The endpoint has room for improvement because it's restrictive, it's very sensitive. Sometimes it can delete something that you need and so sometimes you have to disable the antivirus."
"The software download features could stand improvement."
"It would be a lot easier if I could add multiple user accounts within a single device."
"They need to build in a central console because central integration is not very good right now."
"The updates for legacy systems are not rolled out frequently."
"If I had more reporting, the product would be an A plus."
"When implementing this solution, sometimes we have challenges with SQL migration."
"The client can show as offline sometimes, and that becomes a bit difficult for troubleshooting. We end up basically redeploying the client. This is something that could be improved in the future."
"I would like to see XDR features and endpoint sensor become available."
"It needs better global visibility of the virtual environment."
"Their automation needs improvement."
Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 96 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "High availability, effective VPM, and responsive support". Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.