We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Verification Station is valuable."
"It's a very useful and user-friendly product."
"ABBYY Vantage has been designed as a user-friendly solution, making the setup process require only a couple of days."
"The OTR (Optical Text Recognition) is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"While using ABBYY FlexiCapture we did not use the generic models that they do have for invoice and purchase orders. For one of the use-cases, the document was exactly the purchase order, but we are not using that generic model. We are creating the model from Scratch. However, if I was to compare ABBYY FlexiCapture with other IA tools, the machine learning and how the extraction is done is far better than competitors. This allows a lot less effort for the development."
"The advantage for ABBYY Vantage is in the visual tools to parameterize and set documents."
"The solution responds well to automatic document classifications with a 90% success rate."
"Vantage is flexible and customizable. It's a low-code/no-code tool, so you don't need to get into detailed coding. You can also use AI to accomplish medium-complex tasks."
"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"The drag and drop functionality is quite good."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."
"ABBYY Vantage is mainly available on the public cloud but for clients that use a private cloud, it is complicated to set up the solution."
"Quite complex, particularly for those who are not tech savvy."
"ABBYY Vantage could improve the processing of handwritten notes."
"There is an area of improvement. For example, when we read the data from the OCR, the accuracy is not good."
"Could be simplified, particularly the UI."
"It could be more intuitive. It's huge and has many options, and that makes it difficult. You have to go to Google and search for documents and videos to try and understand how it works. Some tools or processes or some parts of the process should be intuitive to make it easier for the developers."
"Occasionally, we found the Machine Learning feature to be not working as per our expectations. Sometimes, it also failed to extract details from a PDF. It would be great if training batches work with 100% accuracy. I don't see any other major concerns with ABBYY FlexiCapture."
"We would like the workflow building within this solution to be more transparent, which would allow us to model the process."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."
"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
"There is really nothing special about the capabilities of this product."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 6th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, HyperScience, Microsoft Power Automate and Instabase, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and HyperScience. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.