We performed a comparison between Blue Prism and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Blue Prism currently supports SQL Servers and structured data."
"RPA processes are helpful when we need interaction with different applications and close the technical gaps between them. In one of the use cases that we evaluated, there was a single Excel template from a vendor. The Excel file has 7,000 objects, and it included information about the part numbers, prices, and some of the details about each object of the aircraft. This file had to be input to SAP, so a human had to enter these 7,000 objects one by one, which is a pretty mechanical and uninteresting task. The RPA bot was easily able to import this file. Without RPA, this import had to be done by a person who had to do the same task 7,000 times just to import one contract."
"Blue Prism takes good security measures and is user friendly."
"The development interface is quite easy to work with."
"The solution has cross-application features where it can be setup with SAP, email, or SharePoint."
"We've started to use some of the new features such as translation, cognitive, and we are finding them useful. We are also finding API integrations very useful."
"The only feature that stands out in Blue Prism, as compared to other tools, is security. This is the only reason for still having Blue Prism in our bucket. It is very secure and reliable, and it has also been in the market for a very long time. We automated a lot of federal and government automation processes very recently with this solution."
"We find the stability and the ease of reusing code design valuable."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."
"The solution is scalable."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Navigation within the UI could be improved."
"The activities that we do are a bit difficult to do in Blue Prism as compared to UiPath. UiPath provides create activities and create packages related to AI analytical skills. This is something that Blue Prism doesn't have."
"I don't like that it is so limited, anything that you do feels limited in your capabilities."
"Technical support is in need of improvement."
"Blue Prism has been a little bit slow when it comes to the commitments on their roadmap. They had some delays last year, so I hope they make it up this year... For example, they were launching a Decipher tool. It was delayed by more than a year. It has still not launched."
"We had a lot of challenges managing authentication and reusing or using external authentication providers."
"We would like to see intelligent process automation that integrates RPA and machine learning."
"My clients report that there is a little bit of a challenge regarding the cost-benefit ratio."
"Its documentation is not widely available on the web. They should work on the availability of its documentation. In Automation Anywhere, there is a feature called Discovery Bot that automatically records the process steps and suggests a possible bot. I am not sure if such a feature is available in Kofax. If it is not available, it will be very good to have this feature. "
"The technical support must be improved."
"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."
"There is really nothing special about the capabilities of this product."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The product has some constraints and performance issues."
"Exception handling needs to be improved."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
Blue Prism is ranked 4th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 86 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Blue Prism is rated 7.8, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Blue Prism writes "Way more efficient for debugging than other tools but the UI is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Blue Prism is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Pega Robotic Process Automation and Blue Prism Cloud, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Tungsten TotalAgility and SAS Data Management. See our Blue Prism vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
