We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"Microsoft PowerApps's most valuable features we found are that it's very similar to the other Microsoft products, you can do the basic automation quite quickly. The interface is similar to the other Microsoft products which makes it easy to navigate around because we are used to Microsoft products."
"Time to market is most valuable because you can make apps pretty fast. It also has pretty good integration."
"I can have a SharePoint list and connect with users through PowerApps to present the information."
"When compared with Microsoft Power Automate, it is a bit more mature, and we're able to build things pretty rapidly."
"It offers integration with several Microsoft products, including SharePoint and Outlook, in my opinion, is a huge plus."
"The solution becomes easier the set up once you get used to it."
"In Microsoft PowerApps the most valuable features are the fully customizable design that we can control everything that we would like to control. For example, the integration between Microsoft and third-party services through pre-built connectors, and the functionality to create custom connectors."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft PowerApps is the user interface."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"Integration with databases and other tools needs to be improved."
"The solution must provide more integration with third-party applications."
"The stability of this solution could be better."
"Microsoft PowerApps is not intended for customizing what's generated in a major way."
"We're not in production yet, so we're still working through some issues."
"It's easy to use."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see custom APIs, better integration with other solutions, and more connectors available."
"The flexibility of the user interface could be better."
AgilePoint is ranked 23rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 5 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". AgilePoint is most compared with Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform, Camunda and Appian, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our AgilePoint vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.