AgilePoint vs Camunda comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AgilePoint Logo
467 views|370 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Camunda Logo
31,854 views|19,406 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AgilePoint vs. Camunda Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature.""AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth.""The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy.""I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use.""AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."

More AgilePoint Pros →

"The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me.""The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN.""The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need.""We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use""The most valuable feature is the scheduling.""The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.""It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases.""The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."

More Camunda Pros →

Cons
"They should add more information about functionality.""Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes.""While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta.""The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier.""It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."

More AgilePoint Cons →

"It has a Postgres database at the backend, and it is very difficult to scale if you increase the number of processes running. We did hit some barriers. We were able to overcome them, but it was a problem. Camunda has another product called Camunda Cloud, which supposedly doesn't have the same scalability problems, but we are not using Camunda Cloud because the set of features is smaller than Camunda On-Premises. So, its scalability can be improved. Because it has a single database, it is more difficult to scale if you have a huge success.""An improvement would be to support Angular 2 instead of AngularJS, which is quite old.""I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack.""The product does not have a dictionary.""The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners.""The latency of API could be decreased.""In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly.""Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."

More Camunda Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions."
  • "I think the price is reasonable."
  • "Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment."
  • "It is more cost-effective than local tools."
  • More AgilePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
  • "We are using the open-source version of this solution."
  • "Camunda is much cheaper."
  • "I use the open-source free version."
  • "The open-source version of the product is free to use."
  • "The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
  • "Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
  • "We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
  • More Camunda Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management.
    Top Answer:It is more cost-effective than local tools like Mendix Health System.
    Top Answer:There could be a knowledge base or a learning network included in the product. They should add more information about functionality. Additionally, it needs more integration with tools like Python… more »
    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to… more »
    Top Answer:Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    467
    Comparisons
    370
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    337
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    31,854
    Comparisons
    19,406
    Reviews
    24
    Average Words per Review
    934
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Apache Airflow logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    Bizagi logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Pega BPM logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM BPM logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Camunda BPM
    Learn More
    Camunda
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    AgilePoint NX is a top-five low-code platform that empowers you to quickly build anything from simple eforms and workflows to complex, multi-tenant SaaS apps, IoT apps, and composite LOB systems without writing code and at a price almost any enterprise can afford.

    Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

    Sample Customers
    Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand
    24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise64%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    AgilePoint vs. Camunda
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AgilePoint vs. Camunda and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AgilePoint is ranked 31st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 5 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". AgilePoint is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform and ServiceNow Now Platform, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our AgilePoint vs. Camunda report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.