We performed a comparison between Akamai mPulse and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the solutions overall performance. It is very efficient and accurate for our usage."
"Enables dynamic injections from within the product which is great."
"The best thing about Grafana is the visualization. The colors and the ease of use make it very user-friendly."
"The comparison feature is very good."
"The integration between Loki and Tempo is valuable."
"This solution provides valuable insights into the health of our infrastructure in real time."
"Collaboration: Shares data and dashboards across teams."
"The solution has good features."
"Kubernetes could help us to better visualize the trend of our data by recording and displaying our history over a chosen duration, such as the last 30 days."
"Grafana has improved our analysis capability to solve an issue, increasing the co-working between IT services and business services."
"The end-to-end distributor tracing connectivity isn't there."
"In the next release, I would like to see the possibility of sharing the metric from this solution with other solutions."
"It would be helpful if they simplified the data source."
"The solution should include online support."
"The security needs to be improved, such as the capacity to add permissions on dashboards."
"The look and feel of the charting and graph capabilities in Grafana could improve. If they provided a storyboard type of feature as they have in other solutions, such as PowerBI. The multi-tenanted and stitch metrics features could improve."
"The main drawback is the necessity for endpoint monitoring."
"The documentation or training provided by Grafana is limited compared to its competitors, like Splunk."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"Trigger limits are difficult to see in a graph."
Akamai mPulse is ranked 53rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews. Akamai mPulse is rated 6.6, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Akamai mPulse writes "Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". Akamai mPulse is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, Datadog, AppDynamics and Sentry, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Sentry, Azure Monitor, Elastic Observability and Dynatrace. See our Akamai mPulse vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.