We performed a comparison between Akamai mPulse and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Enables dynamic injections from within the product which is great."
"The most valuable feature is the solutions overall performance. It is very efficient and accurate for our usage."
"The most valuable features are infrastructure monitoring and application performance monitoring (APM)."
"The stability of New Relic APM is very good."
"We like the performance of the product."
"It gives insights to non-technical people about what technical issues are most important, how much it impacts customers, and potentially, where we should be targeting our development teams when they have time."
"End-user Synthetics and monitoring are very good."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to receive in-depth information about applications. It can detect a lot of important information."
"The deep insights, which will give you the metrics (not a high level), so we can build out at the database level where the bottleneck is. This has been pretty helpful."
"The most valuable features are the dashboards and tracing."
"In the next release, I would like to see the possibility of sharing the metric from this solution with other solutions."
"The end-to-end distributor tracing connectivity isn't there."
"The monitoring is only as good as the alerts that it produces. By having it set up fine grain alerting, it is a bit of a pain."
"There are times when you restart the engines and the servers have a unique ID for the host and you need to remove the server. It is difficult because some are on-premise and others are production hosts. Having downtime is not very good when updating. However, it is not a constant issue."
"The solution could improve by having more network monitoring features, such as for all the infrastructure."
"I would like an infrastructure network that provides real-time views, showing the issues."
"The solution needs to have staging."
"The browser isn't exactly reliable."
"The connectivity between legacy and newer cloud applications is not great."
"New Relic APM can improve the information when we dig deeper to check a problem. There should be more detailed information provided."
Akamai mPulse is ranked 53rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. Akamai mPulse is rated 6.6, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Akamai mPulse writes "Lacking in regard to observation of the entire platform but does dynamic injections from within". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Akamai mPulse is most compared with Dynatrace, Grafana, Datadog, AppDynamics and Sentry, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus. See our Akamai mPulse vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.