We performed a comparison between Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The dashboard is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management are the multiple methodology possibilities for projects. It has hybrid, traditional, and Agile capabilities. Additionally, the solution integrates well with other platforms, such as Microsoft Azure."
"The technical support is pretty good. ServiceNow has consistently provided excellent assistance."
"The performance is good."
"The most important feature of ServiceNow IT Business Management is flexibility."
"The demand management tool is very strategic because it helps assess risk, gives you a visual of different demands, and rates those values."
"The PPM module is an excellent service."
"The program is stable."
"The stability is excellent. ServiceNow is one of the leading platforms when it comes to stability."
"The user-experience, enhanced performance, and in-hand governance can be improved."
"Dashboard interface is limited functionally and not very user friendly"
"ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management could improve by having more Agile features. Other solutions, such as Rally have more."
"I would like to see some artificial intelligence incorporated into the management functions."
"A major improvement we would like to see is definitely around agile management."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"We track salaries or paychecks of the resources. They change from time to time, such as every six months or every year. If they can come up with a default or out-of-the-box feature to manage those multiple payable costs so that we can automatically calculate the project costs rolled up. That would be the coolest feature that we can expect from ServiceNow. We would like to have an automatic feature to manage the payable costs. We should be able to manage or maintain multiple pay costs so that while calculating the project roll-up costs for individual projects, the respective pay costs in a particular period are picked up automatically from the backend. Currently, we have to customize that. It is doable. We have done it but through customization."
"The interface isn't user-friendly."
"The only issue for us is the pricing. It’s quite high in comparison with the competition."
More Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is ranked 14th in Project Portfolio Management with 4 reviews while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 27 reviews. Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is rated 7.6, while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management writes "Helps us to implement and understand the status of our projects". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management writes "A very strategic demand management tool that visualizes risks and ratings in a bubble chart". Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management is most compared with ARIS BPA, LeanIX, Jira, Alfabet FastLane and Broadcom Clarity , whereas ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Jira Align, Microsoft Project Server and Polarion ALM. See our Alfabet IT Planning & Portfolio Management vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.