Apica vs New Relic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apica  Logo
904 views|550 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
New Relic Logo
24,375 views|19,316 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apica and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. New Relic Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"What I like the most is that Apica can simulate different browsers and different versions of desktop or mobile browsers.""It uses a basic scripting language, which is easy to learn and customize as needed. Compared to LoadRunner, I found writing and customizing code much easier in Apica.""We see the benefit almost every day. It allows us to be alerted whenever there is a store that is not responding properly around the world. We do have a network operation center (NOC) who receives these alerts, immediately checking if everything is okay.""The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integrate with other tools with a separate execution environment. The tool is also easy to use.""It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica.""It is easy to set up and configure.""I like the transcript download feature. And with UI scripting, it's helpful that Apica handles a lot of the backend work automatically. I don't have to tag everything manually, though I can tag elements later if needed. It's really good at recording the steps.""There are several features that are really good. The first one is the flexibility and the advanced configuration that Apica offers when it comes to configuring synthetic checks. It provides the ability to customize how the check should be performed and it is very flexible in the number of synthetic locations that it can use. It allows us to run scripts from different locations all over the world, and they have a really good number of these locations."

More Apica Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the ability to manage the application flow.""The most valuable features are the dashboards and tracing.""It has the ability to monitor random URLs not tied to the one pinger per application (though it costs extra).""What I like best about New Relic APM is its user interface because it's simple. The most valuable feature of New Relic APM is end-to-end monitoring.""The deep insights, which will give you the metrics (not a high level), so we can build out at the database level where the bottleneck is. This has been pretty helpful.""The feature I found most valuable is being able to design my queries. It's easy to design a query.""As New Relic is already integrated with Drupal, we can get our projects done with best practice and with the best value that we believe in.""It offers helpful user metrics so we can learn more about the user experience."

More New Relic Pros →

Cons
"We have been focused on reducing polling times for synthetic checks. We have gone from 10 minutes down to five minutes for a pretty broad swath, but there is some appetite to reduce that further, which could be an improvement.""When it comes to the way the internal agent is installed, because you can install an application on a server, I would love to see the application Docker-ized. If you could install internal agents using Docker or using containers, it would be easier for us to manage them and spin up internal agents.""The having to install an application on your desktop to utilize something like ZebraTester is a little cumbersome. It would be nice to see that become a web-based application. Having the documentation a little more accessible, and easier to digest by people who are just learning how to use the framework, especially when it comes to more complex or more edge-based cases would be really helpful to have.""The initial screen on their dashboard could have a bit more data, but this is a small thing. It could have more data, so we do not need to drill down to a screen behind that initial information. I would like them to get a little better on the user interfaces that we need to go into.""If you are adding any input file, the tool fails to capture the path.""Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow.""I have noticed that the tool isn't widely recognized outside our organization. Also, there aren't any tutorials or dedicated resources for this tool, making it challenging for newcomers to learn. It would be beneficial if someone experienced with it could provide guidance.""Learning the tool has always been a little difficult from a scripting perspective because the framework is proprietary and unique. Once we became used to what it does and how to perform it, then it became easier for my team and me. I would like to see some of the testing steps be part of a more well-known language, like Java or Python. That would be a big improvement."

More Apica Cons →

"The connectivity between legacy and newer cloud applications is not great.""We would like a dashboard feature to be created for this product. This would allow us to monitor both the front and back-end of our UIs performance, and then report on it.""I would like to be able to invest less time in IT and ad hocs. We should be concentrating on other issues.""The solution should include more detailed reports for SQL database requests.""New Relic is very slow, and the app is a bit frustrating to use, which is something that has been happening a lot in the past year. During the last six months, I have noticed that it has become extremely laggy.""I would like to have storage monitoring. E.g., being able to monitor SANS, specifically protocols, like NFS and CIFS metrics.""We would like to receive more AWS-specific details from the New Relic Dashboard, like EC2 health.""The deployment process could be improved."

More New Relic Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."
  • "Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."
  • "The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."
  • "License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."
  • "The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."
  • "Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."
  • "The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."
  • "The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."
  • More Apica Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "New Relic is either free with low retention and minimal functionalities, or expensive with full options and retention."
  • "The monthly cost os $1000 per server per month, but it could be even more. We pay about $250 for the server, and then New Relic wants over $1000 to give us statistics on those servers."
  • "Cost is significant with a lot of extras."
  • "It would be nice if we could buy it annually instead of monthly."
  • "If it’s the right tool, it doesn’t matter what it costs because you’re going to get it back many-fold from your productivity."
  • "I recommend using the free version of New Relic. If you like the free version and understand its importance for your company, you can move to the trial. Then, you can migrate to the paid version."
  • "There is a picture which goes to your browser and it monitors requests from other users. However, it's impossible to use now because the price is very high. The feature is very nice, but I tried it during the trial period, and the current price makes it impossible to use."
  • "They gave us aggressive discounts when they were brought in for the first time, but they have also kept them for the year-on-year renewals, which has been absolutely fine."
  • More New Relic Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I like the transcript download feature. And with UI scripting, it's helpful that Apica handles a lot of the backend work automatically. I don't have to tag everything manually, though I can tag… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange. The pricing depends on the scale of the organization using it. With more users, you will need licenses to maintain it, and it will get… more »
    Top Answer:It's not very user-friendly. There are more areas of improvement as well. We could use more detailed information in the request and response sections. Also, with correlation, there are times we can't… more »
    Top Answer:There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra… more »
    Top Answer:It allows the restriction of privileges and control of users.
    Top Answer:The solution only supports the cloud platform and not on-premises. Therefore, they should assess supporting the licensing on-premises as well.
    Ranking
    Views
    904
    Comparisons
    550
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    523
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    24,375
    Comparisons
    19,316
    Reviews
    32
    Average Words per Review
    531
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Datadog logo
    Compared 26% of the time.
    Dynatrace logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    AppDynamics logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    Apache JMeter logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    OpenText LoadRunner Cloud logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Dynatrace logo
    Compared 17% of the time.
    Datadog logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Elastic Observability logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Grafana logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Prometheus logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic
    New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM
    Learn More
    Overview

    Apica offers a unified perspective on the entire technology stack, encompassing logs, metrics, traces, and APIs. This operational data fabric facilitates quick identification and resolution of performance issues throughout an enterprise's infrastructure. The platform's user-friendly features, including a drag-and-drop interface for dashboards and seamless integrations with tools like Prometheus and Elasticsearch, enhance ease of use and management. Apica's active observability swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform's advanced data management centralizes observability data, simplifying storage, search, and analysis, thereby unveiling valuable insights and patterns. Apica also ensures compliance and governance, providing audit trails to help enterprises meet regulatory requirements. Whether for enterprises of all sizes or those with intricate distributed systems, Apica emerges as a robust tool to elevate technology stack observability and performance.

    New Relic

    New Relic is a prominent application performance management (APM) and a real-time monitoring solution. This cloud-based platform is tailored for both small developers and large enterprises to track and optimize application performance.

    New Relic's strength lies in its comprehensive toolset that enables developers to diagnose and resolve issues quickly, ensuring high uptime and optimal performance of applications. The platform offers a wide range of features including real-time application monitoring, detailed performance insights, customizable dashboards, and in-depth analytics. It supports numerous programming languages and integrates with existing development workflows, making it a versatile choice for diverse IT environments.

    What are the key features of New Relic?

    • APM: Provides detailed insights into application performance, helping to identify bottlenecks and areas for improvement.

    • Infrastructure Monitoring: Monitors cloud, on-premises, and hybrid infrastructures to provide visibility into the health of servers and networks.

    • Real User Monitoring: Captures and analyzes end-user interactions to help understand the user experience across web and mobile applications.

    • Synthetic Monitoring: Uses simulated traffic to test and optimize websites and applications before they go live.

    • Dashboard and Visualization: Customizable dashboards that display key metrics and trends, facilitating quick decision-making and reporting.

    When evaluating New Relic, you should focus on the ROI aspects such as improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced customer satisfaction. The platform's ability to provide actionable insights helps to preemptively address potential issues, thereby saving costs and improving operational efficiency.

    New Relic is widely implemented across various industries, including technology, e-commerce, finance, and media, where ensuring smooth application performance is critical to business success. Companies in these sectors use New Relic to gain a competitive edge by ensuring their digital services are reliable and perform at peak efficiency.

    In summary, New Relic is an essential tool for businesses seeking to enhance their application performance through advanced monitoring and real-time analytics. Its comprehensive features and flexible pricing make it a suitable choice for organizations aiming to optimize their digital operations effectively.


    Sample Customers
    HBO
    World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm42%
    Hospitality Company17%
    Insurance Company17%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm41%
    Insurance Company11%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Media Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Media Company9%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization30%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise74%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise80%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise35%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apica vs. New Relic
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. New Relic and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apica is ranked 45th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 6 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. Apica is rated 8.2, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Apica writes "Offers transcript download feature and easy to set up and configure tests but not very user friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Apica is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus. See our Apica vs. New Relic report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.