We performed a comparison between Appian and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"Low code development: Code can be developed pretty quickly which leads to less turnaround time for automation of business processes."
"It reduces development time in half making us more efficient."
"I find the BPM the most valuable feature."
"Appian's most valuable feature is that we can create end-to-end process workflows with minimum turnaround."
"Technical support is quite responsive."
"The Application Designer is very user friendly. There are also lot of plug-ins that you can use and, for the most part, they are free."
"The technical support is excellent."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"The ability of the interface to load automatic data is not great."
"Even though the company has made great improvements in online documentation, featuring rich material which includes case studies of real-life use cases, the material could definitely be better in quality and coverage of use cases."
"There could be a scope of enhancement for capturing the variety of use cases."
"The solution could use some more tutorials to help brand new users figure out how to use the product effectively."
"We'd like improved functionality for testing new devices."
"It is difficult to set up the on-premise version."
"Lacks business rules management as part of the solution."
"Authoring tool is slow to use resulted in limitations on how quickly solutions can be built."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda and webMethods Integration Server. See our Appian vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.