We compared Azure Stack and AWS Outposts based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Azure Stack and AWS Outposts both offer seamless integration with their respective cloud environments, advanced security features, and competitive pricing options. However, Azure Stack users praise its excellent customer service and support, while AWS Outposts users emphasize its flexibility, scalability, and data control. Azure Stack users value its hybrid cloud integration and security, while AWS Outposts users appreciate its local cloud capabilities and efficient deployment process.
Features: Azure Stack is highly valued for its seamless integration with Azure cloud, consistent hybrid cloud environment, and advanced security. Meanwhile, AWS Outposts is praised for its seamless integration with existing AWS infrastructure, local cloud capabilities, and enhanced data control. Additionally, users appreciate AWS Outposts' flexibility and scalability, ease of management, and efficient deployment process.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Azure Stack is reasonable and users don't encounter unexpected expenses. The licensing process is straightforward. On the other hand, AWS Outposts is also considered to have reasonable setup costs and users find the setup process easy and simple., Azure Stack: Positive ROI reported by users, with benefits including improved scalability, flexibility, security, cost savings, integration with Azure services, ease of deployment, and optimized workflows. AWS Outposts: Positive ROI reported by users, with benefits including improved operational efficiency, cost savings, scalability, flexibility, and meeting specific business needs.
Room for Improvement: Azure Stack has room for improvement in terms of its user interface, documentation, performance and stability, available services and features, and collaboration and support options. On the other hand, user feedback suggests that AWS Outposts also requires enhancements for a better user experience.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for Azure Stack and AWS Outposts show that the duration required for establishing a new tech solution can vary among users. However, some users of Azure Stack mentioned needing a week for both deployment and setup, while users of AWS Outposts reported spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup., Azure Stack has been praised for its excellent and prompt customer service, providing assistance and resolving issues quickly. Users appreciate the knowledgeable and helpful support team. On the other hand, AWS Outposts also receives positive feedback for their prompt and effective customer support, with users appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team.
The summary above is based on 32 interviews we conducted recently with Azure Stack and AWS Outposts users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"If you compare with the full bundle of these services, you can see the difference. This is enough for these locations in private data centers. Because the main reasons why the customers want to have it on their side are for the low latency and the security of their critical data."
"The most valuable aspect is its ability to provide interfaces for events."
"The most valuable aspect is that it comes in a rack form factor which makes it incredibly easy to use and deploy various AWS services."
"AWS Outposts brings native AWS services, infrastructure, and API to our on-premises data center or co-location facilities."
"I think the keys to success for the solution is the easy-to-use user interface and the fact that the development team really likes the platform."
"Outposts allows you to isolate your private environment from the public cloud provider while enabling almost all the features that are available on public cloud services. That is the beauty of this service. It's an infrastructure that you can put in your data center and seamlessly connect to the public cloud."
"With AWS, we've had seamless integration and support for many of our applications."
"Azure offers a wide range of services, catering to various needs."
"The most valuable features are the control and flexibility that we have, where we can build our own solutions from scratch."
"It is very easy to learn and apply to other things."
"The solution is easy to use, especially for individuals who are not familiar with coding and has security built-in."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Stack is its ability to store and process large amounts of data."
"If a user wants to upgrade Office 365 from any of the packages, there is no disruption happening during migration, and the data is kept safe. There's no loss of data."
"The solution pairs well with other MS services and saves us a lot of money."
"Technical support is quick and responsive."
"Depending on the installation process, we have found some bugs and issues with the solution when the same platform is not used."
"It would be beneficial to have the option for capacity expansion."
"The pricing model needs improvement because right now it's very expensive. All of these solutions are very expensive and it prevents other customers or owners of data centers from buying it."
"Also, it would be beneficial if AWS allowed for more granular and customizable pricing options."
"It would be great if it could support Glue services."
"The platform needs to spend more time investing in strengthening its governance and information tools and consider the real needs of its customers."
"Outposts supports elastic coordinator services, but not elastic container services, which is the native service for containers in AWS. That is something missing in this product."
"Azure Stack needs to improve integrations."
"It does not give you a complete, production-ready setup."
"It would be better to have more services and functionality when it comes to database software and computing."
"I would only recommend this solution to smaller organizations like ours because I cannot really speculate what big issues that the bigger organizations will face."
"I would like to see the AI side come to one hundred percent in the near future."
"For some years, Azure has been working on Synapse. It's their big footprint on the analytics stack. It's a little bit heavy right now in the sense that there are too many components and it's too complex."
"Our only issue with Azure Stack so far is that the networking is very closed. You need to have the extended LAN to connect the internal LAN to the Azure Stack. Any connection we have needs site-to-site VPN connectivity instead of an internal connection, so Azure Stack has room for improvement in the networking area."
"Microsoft is changing the Azure Stack interface all the time, so it's sometimes hard to find the functionality or the service you're looking for. A feature was in one place and now it has moved somewhere else."
AWS Outposts is ranked 4th in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 7 reviews while Azure Stack is ranked 1st in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 61 reviews. AWS Outposts is rated 8.8, while Azure Stack is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS Outposts writes "Has the ability to provide interfaces for events and allows you to work both offline and online". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Stack writes "Effective tool for cloud and on-premise environments that offers seamless deployment". AWS Outposts is most compared with Google Anthos, VMware Cloud Foundation and Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2), whereas Azure Stack is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2), Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), Google Anthos and VMware Software Defined Data Center. See our AWS Outposts vs. Azure Stack report.
See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
