We performed a comparison between Azure Stack and Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is pretty stable."
"It's a good and cost effective solution for any organization. We can deploy the tech solution on premises and also in the cloud."
"Its customer service is good."
"Azure Stack is like a hybrid model with a CI/CD pipeline. The IaaS and PaaS model works well with a hybrid type of connectivity."
"Azure Stack is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Azure Stack is its ability to store and process large amounts of data."
"It is helpful from a security point of view because we can create our own isolated, private environments that contain virtual networks, and we can put security rules in place."
"The most valuable feature is the OCR, which I use for reading PDFs."
"The scalability is good."
"The overall infrastructure is the most valuable part of Nutanix Cloud Clusters."
"The solution can scale well."
"The most valuable feature is having the full features of my Nutanix on-premises applications in the cloud."
"Having a single pane of glass where you can have both your on-prem and anything else that you spin up within AWS is useful."
"I've been very pleased with their support overall."
"In terms of dealing with our business-critical workloads, Nutanix is a highly scalable, highly resilient, and very high-performing solution."
"The most valuable features of Nutanix Clusters are Prism Central, Micro-segmentation, and cluster scaling automation."
"I would like to see better support for containers."
"From a security perspective, there are certain things which could be improved."
"Some tools do not run without the internet."
"It does not give you a complete, production-ready setup."
"There are some minor issues or bugs with it that I know are there."
"Azure Stack is an expensive product that should be made more cost-effective."
"Azure Stack could be improved with more integration, governance tools, monitor tools, and lift and shift tools."
"The solution could use more training materials to help users understand how to use the product effectively. Online training would also be a beneficial addition to the product."
"There are still some things that could be improved about the product."
"The biggest weakness with Clusters at this point is that the adoption rate is low because customers don't know enough about it."
"Some of the interfaces aren't as intuitive as they should be."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"The technical support for Nutanix Clusters could be better."
"We've had some challenges with the implementation."
"The pricing can be better."
"Perhaps the one thing that could be improved is the documentation around the solution."
Azure Stack is ranked 1st in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 61 reviews while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is ranked 5th in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 9 reviews. Azure Stack is rated 8.0, while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Stack writes "Effective tool for cloud and on-premise environments that offers seamless deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) writes "Helps manage costs, eliminates waste, and has excellent technical support". Azure Stack is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, AWS Outposts, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), Google Anthos and VMware Software Defined Data Center, whereas Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, AWS Outposts, VMware Cloud on AWS, Microsoft Azure and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). See our Azure Stack vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) report.
See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.