We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and NAKIVO Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery."
"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."
"Every new version has got some tweaks and improvements in stability and speed."
"It can be quickly configured via web pages."
"The product is good for protecting very low-budget offices, whereas other solutions fail in terms of cost and footprint of the VMs involved."
"The backup and replication are great."
"We spend less time to get data recovered."
"Nakivo makes our backs-ups more reliable and easy to recover in case of full damage or partial retrieval of files - all at a convenient cost."
"It was also very easy to configure backups to be sent offsite to a separate repository for disaster recovery needs."
"Creating a backup task in NAKIVO is fast and easy."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"It could include more of a backup and recovery."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."
"There are many features we have not had the opportunity to try, such as Tape Backups, Office 365 backups, and many other things."
"Due to the fact that we are HP and Fugit partners as well, it would be nice if Nakivo would allow support for HP and Fugit storage."
"I need no more valuable features for backs-up. I have not yet tried the latest release, however, I have all the features that I need."
"UI could use some upgrades. The UI is basic, but functional."
"It could be a little bit faster in terms of backup and offer more reliable SQL server backups."
"We want the backup job to consume fewer resources, as the utilization is very high if we choose the best compression."
"From our experience, the main factor that could be improved is adding more cloud services that are supported as a backup repository."
"We'd like to see a legacy environment backup, like AIX, etc."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 19 reviews while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is ranked 5th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 85 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NAKIVO Backup & Replication writes "Good deduplication, easy to configure, and offers a free version". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Commvault Cloud, whereas NAKIVO Backup & Replication is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and Zerto. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.