We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Grafana is a flexible, open source solution that is highly valued for its user-friendly interface, customizable graphs, and accurate application metrics. It is also praised for its moderate pricing and a positive return on investment. While both BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Grafana have valuable features, Grafana's good integration and visually appealing graphs make it a popular choice and the preferred solution.
"It provides common administration, and a Single Sign-On Platform with RBAC, which eases the cross launch between multiple tools"
"We're using native monitoring capabilities for all our server hardware, for visibility for applications, for URLs, for webpage response and accuracy, and for monitoring network throughput in a lot of particular instances. We're using lightweight protocols for pinging, for DNS, for LDAP."
"I use the solution to monitor servers, databases, Windows, Linux, and web services."
"The event management tool builds correlation logic and protection algorithms into a field of events that is valuable when a data center goes down."
"It has provided us with a single location to host all events to be viewed/monitored by our NOC. This has greatly helped them to streamline their processes."
"It allows our operations team to have one single application to reference when investigating issues in our environment."
"The initial setup of BMC TrueSight Operations Management was easy."
"Valuable features include wide support for monitoring, strong event management, service management capability, baselining (analytics) and easy to integrate other tools with it."
"The most important feature of Grafana is its alarm formatting capability."
"The dashboards are the most valuable features."
"Visualisation: It is easy to create beautiful, understanding graphs, snapshots to share the graphs with people who do not have access to Grafana, and templating to create powerful graphs."
"Almost any kind of visualization is possible with Grafana and all dashboards are configurable."
"The best thing about Grafana is the visualization. The colors and the ease of use make it very user-friendly."
"The most valuable aspect is customization. There are many customizations possible, so I like that."
"It is easy to change and move virtual servers."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"In our company, we faced some issues with the solution’s application endpoint, IP, and the physical location of the transactions."
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management could improve the reporting."
"We have a unique use case because BMC typically sells this solution into enterprises that are deploying it within their IT, versus to a managed services provider like us where we're supporting thousands of customers. Multi-tenancy and the scalability have been challenges along the way, as we've grown... If anything could have gone better as we were ramping this up and adding a lot of volume to it, I would say it's the scalability. That would be one thing that could be improved."
"The solution is overly complex."
"More modules for less popular applications and better documentation."
"The dashboards are not good. We have a limited dashboard, and if we want better dashboards, we need to use other solutions like Grafana because the TrueSight dashboards are not good."
"I think the ease of deployment needs to be looked at. It would be great if the deployment was faster and easier."
"The sizing (which is difficult), the maintenance of it and the upgrade paths. This is a difficult area which is not easy to cover, as every client has a different approach of implementing the product."
"I would like the ability to download my results into any format in order to share the information with my clients."
"The look and feel of the charting and graph capabilities in Grafana could improve. If they provided a storyboard type of feature as they have in other solutions, such as PowerBI. The multi-tenanted and stitch metrics features could improve."
"It can take a considerable amount of time to learn the graphs if a long duration is selected."
"It's difficult to see the trends on the graph when the range is too long."
"Writing queries can be a bit difficult because the syntax must be maintained."
"I have a problem with Grafana in the area of documentation."
"Grafana doesn't provide anything for reporting."
"If there was an issue on one node, we couldn't drill down and see all the issues on other nodes."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 17th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 49 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and New Relic, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.