We performed a comparison between Camunda and Make based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"The product is stable."
"It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it."
"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"It has a Postgres database at the backend, and it is very difficult to scale if you increase the number of processes running. We did hit some barriers. We were able to overcome them, but it was a problem. Camunda has another product called Camunda Cloud, which supposedly doesn't have the same scalability problems, but we are not using Camunda Cloud because the set of features is smaller than Camunda On-Premises. So, its scalability can be improved. Because it has a single database, it is more difficult to scale if you have a huge success."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
"When building interfaces, there are limited tools to work with, especially when dealing with different types of tasks, such as user tasks and system tasks."
"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Process Automation with 71 reviews while Make is ranked 29th in Process Automation with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Make is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Make writes "An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Make is most compared with . See our Camunda vs. Make report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.