We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"The most valuable features are the integration capabilities - BPM can connect with almost any legacy or advanced system."
"There is information during the process that the analyst will look at, their procedures. We created a part of the application such that the business can change those procedures as needed, on a daily, weekly, monthly basis. As the reps go through the process, they don't necessarily know it's changing, they just know they have to refer to some documentation, and the business can keep that up to date."
"Integration is a big plus for me."
"Technical support is good. They are very responsive. It is usually me who takes more time to get back to them than they take to get back to me, which is good."
"Its dashboard is easy to use and very good. It allows us to customize."
"We are receiving good assistance from the technical support."
"With the tester coach wherein you can interact with the interface while you're designing the process."
"Some of the features that I like the most are team management and process performance. They are both very useful and very powerful with regard to the workflow."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"The integration could be improved."
"We care about technology and support because support is very important and a BPM is not easy to implement."
"IBM BPM can improve the dashboards and reports. It only has two dashboards, and reporting is very difficult to build."
"I have an interest around the robotic piece, and integrating that with the processes. I think that is certainly a good direction to be going."
"There are a few areas, like triggering mechanisms, externally exposed variables, and changing its values."
"Process Server is no more available than new products out there, but in general IBM has a high cost and complex setup."
"The user experience, while it has improved, should continue to improve."
Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.