We performed a comparison between Everest Blueriq and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"Fast prototyping."
"There are a lot of frameworks in the product. I use Pega PRPC the most."
"Pega BPM's most valuable features are case management, integration, the convenience of using REST APIs, and the ease of changing things at the UI level."
"The solution provides us with a very good dashboard."
"Pega is a local platform that has evolved from a BPM perspective. This allows teams using this solution to address complexities without having deep knowledge in a specific development area."
"It's a good tool for workflow automation."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
"There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"We have experienced a few technical challenges, particularly triggering the workflow through file drops and accessing files."
"Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options."
"There have been some performance scalability issues. Suppose you want to add more users. You go from, say, 800 users to 1,500 users, and sometimes that creates issues for which there is no clear explanation. To fix it you have to escalate it with customer service and sometimes the response is not up to the mark in resolving those issues."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"Currently, there isn't any feature I want to be added in the next release of Pega BPM because Pega always adds new features that my team welcomes and looks forward to learning. One area for improvement in the solution is the long learning curve, but after that, you'll find Pega BPM easy to use."
"Pega is claiming they're into low code but as per Gartner Magic Quadrant, Pega is not there now."
Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". Everest Blueriq is most compared with , whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and Microsoft Power Apps.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.