We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and New Relic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."
"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."
"What I like best about New Relic APM is its user interface because it's simple. The most valuable feature of New Relic APM is end-to-end monitoring."
"The integration and configuration of New Relic is straightforward and easy."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The versatility of the solution is its most valuable feature."
"The synthetic alert is the most valuable feature in New Relic APM. I also like the time travel feature and find traceability useful in the solution. New Relic APM also has good response times."
"The most important thing is that it tells us where the latency in throughput and response time are."
"It is a software solution as a service, so I don't have to manage it on-premise."
"The most valuable feature of New Relic is its ease of use."
"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."
"The user interface was not good."
"It is very difficult to award the service level cycles at an endpoint level."
"New Relic needs to improve is the user data schema."
"The solution should include more detailed reports for SQL database requests."
"I would like a feature where I can turn off alerting at a policy level. Thus, when a policy is inactive, I can shut down all of my alerts within the policy."
"The browser isn't exactly reliable."
"They should bring the pricing down to be more competitive."
"We would like to receive more AWS-specific details from the New Relic Dashboard, like EC2 health."
"The product has good documentation for Linux, however, their documentation for Windows is lacking substantially. It's something they need to develop."
More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is ranked 55th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 2 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is rated 6.6, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager writes "Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is most compared with Dynatrace, IBM Application Performance Management and Azure Monitor, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus. See our IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.